Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Cal.com VS Apache CXF

Compare Cal.com VS Apache CXF and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Cal.com logo Cal.com

Cal.com (formerly Calendso) is the open source Calendly alternative.

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index
  • Cal.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-08
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29

Cal.com features and specs

  • Customizable
    Cal.com allows extensive customization to fit various branding and scheduling needs, which makes it adaptable for different types of users including businesses and individuals.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source platform, Cal.com provides the flexibility for developers to modify and extend the software as per their specific needs, fostering a collaborative development environment.
  • Integrations
    Cal.com offers a wide range of integrations with other software tools like Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, and Zoom, enhancing its functionality and making it easier to fit into existing workflows.
  • User-friendly Interface
    Cal.com has an intuitive and clean interface that makes it easy for users of all technical skill levels to set up and manage their scheduling.
  • Privacy-focused
    Cal.com emphasizes data privacy, ensuring user information is handled securely, which is crucial for users who need to comply with regulations like GDPR.

Possible disadvantages of Cal.com

  • Learning Curve
    Although it is highly customizable, the plethora of options and features may result in a steeper learning curve for new users who are not familiar with such scheduling tools.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of Cal.com comes with limitations that may not be sufficient for growing businesses or advanced users who require more comprehensive features.
  • Dependency on Integrations
    Cal.com's effectiveness heavily depends on its integrations. Without these integrations, some users might find the tool less useful or incomplete, especially if their primary tools are not supported.
  • Support
    While open-source has many benefits, it may also mean that immediate, personalized support could be limited compared to fully commercial solutions. This might pose a challenge for users needing quick resolutions.
  • Performance
    As an open-source platform, the performance might vary depending on how it is hosted and managed. Suboptimal configurations could lead to slower performance or downtimes.

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

Analysis of Cal.com

Overall verdict

  • Cal.com is generally considered a good option for scheduling and calendar management.

Why this product is good

  • Cal.com is praised for its open-source nature, allowing for greater customization and integration flexibility. It offers a user-friendly interface and supports various calendar integrations, making it a versatile tool for individuals and businesses alike.

Recommended for

  • Freelancers who need a simple yet effective scheduling tool.
  • Small businesses looking for a customizable scheduling solution.
  • Developers who appreciate open-source software and need a tool they can modify.
  • Businesses seeking a platform that can integrate with existing tools and workflows.

Cal.com videos

+ Add

What can you do with Cal? | Cal.com Version 1.1 Launch | 10 new languages

More videos:

  • Review - Cal.com Version 1.0 Launch Event

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cal.com and Apache CXF)

Cal.com

Apache CXF

Appointments and Scheduling
100 100%
Appointments and Scheduling
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Calendar And Scheduling
100 100%
Calendar And Scheduling
0% 0
Ruby Web Framework
0 0%
Ruby Web Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cal.com and Apache CXF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cal.com and Apache CXF

Cal.com Reviews

Acuity Scheduling alternatives for businesses outgrowing it
The honest read: if you're leaving Acuity because your business outgrew simple scheduling — you need deposits, add-ons, multiple staff and locations, and ideally a booking site you own — Opencals is built for exactly that transition, and pay-as-you-go means it costs nothing until you're earning. If you're leaving for a narrower reason, match it precisely: SimplyBook.me for...
Source: opencals.com
I've poked around a while ago at some Calendly alternatives (specifically was lo... | Hacker News
I tried using https://cal.com for a bit but ended up just switching over to https://zcal.co and it has been great so far. All these other scheduling tools end up trying to do too much and always seem to end up a bit clunky and charge absurd amounts for it
Source: news.ycombinator.com

Apache CXF Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache CXF yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cal.com seems to be a lot more popular than Apache CXF. While we know about 60 links to Cal.com, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Apache CXF. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cal.com mentions (60)

  • "You Wouldn’t Steal a DIV": How I Built My Portfolio
    Then for the component library, I was really into coss ui. I stumbled upon it randomly one day and loved it so much. My Nathan's AI project already had a UI heavily inspired by cal.com: send button, message suggestions... So when I saw they had a shadcn/ui library with that kind of style, it was perfect for what I needed. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • AI Almost Sold Me a Subscription I Didn't Need
    I keep coming back to what would have happened if I didn't have a strong technical understanding of how calendar technology works — the difference between local and cloud calendars, what an ICS feed is, why enterprise auth blocks third-party integrations. If this was many years ago before I gained all this experience, I would have stopped at the first confident answer from my search tool, installed one of those... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Introducing Quackback: Open-Source Feedback Platform with a Built-in MCP Server
    Plausible brought open source to web analytics. Cal.com did it for scheduling. Formbricks did it for surveys. PostHog did it for product analytics. Quackback does it for feedback collection. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • 🤝 Learn Front-End by Doing: Contribute to Cal.com's Open Source...🚀
    In this tutorial, we'll be focusing on Cal.com:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • 5 Side Project Ideas for Developers to Monetize as Micro-SaaS in 2025
    Take Cal.com (https://cal.com/), formerly known as Calendso. It started as an open source alternative to Calendly which offers a free, self-hostable version for users. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 3 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cal.com and Apache CXF, you can also consider the following products

Calendly - Say goodbye to phone and email tag for finding the perfect meeting time with Calendly. It's 100% free, super easy to use and you'll love our customer service.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Acuity Scheduling - Automate your client bookings, cancellations, reminders & payments using the worlds friendliest online scheduling software.

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

TidyCal - Optimize your schedule with custom booking pages and calendar integrations

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

Loading...