Buildah
Podman
containerd
CRI-O
Crane
ZeroVM
BuildKit
LXD
GitHub Pages
Vercel
Netlify
Jekyll
Cloudflare Pages
surge.sh
Neocities
tiiny.host
Buildah GitHub PagesBased on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than Buildah. While we know about 504 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 14 mentions of Buildah. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
The site itself is a statically generated Next.js app, built in CI and deployed to GitHub Pages via actions/deploy-pages. No server to manage, no hosting bill. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Static sites are fast and cheap to host, but your data goes stale the moment you deploy. This post shows how a SvelteKit portfolio site serves live data from five external sources while still deploying as static HTML to GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
All three themes are designed for accessible deployment. You can host them for free on Netlify, GitHub Pages, Vercel, or Cloudflare Pages. The only cost is a domain name (which can be as cheap as $5/year on Porkbun). - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
This action can store collected benchmark results in GitHub pages branch and provide a chart view. Benchmark results are visualized on the GitHub pages of your project. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
But that's not the case. The blog is a simple static generated website using Jekyll, it is built and served through GitHub Pages. With that in mind it makes more sense to use tools and leverage tool calling. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
