Vercel
Next.js
Netlify
GitHub Pages
Heroku
Render
Tailwind CSS
Railway
Buildah
Podman
containerd
Crane
CRI-O
Artifactory Docker Registry
ZeroVM
LXD
Vercel BuildahBased on our record, Vercel seems to be a lot more popular than Buildah. While we know about 601 links to Vercel, we've tracked only 13 mentions of Buildah. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Before going to the Flutter code, publish this code to GitHub. Then open vercel.com, connect your repository, and deploy it. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
Create an account at Vercel with GitHub and authorize Vercel to see your private repo(s). - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
Upload your folder to Netlify, GitHub Pages, or Vercel — and boom, your portfolio is online! - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
For deployment, you can host your server on platforms like Heroku and Vercel. Both platforms offer free tiers, making it easy to deploy your REST API. - Source: dev.to / 27 days ago
ArNext is a NextJS-based framework that lets you deploy the same codebase both on Vercel and Arweave. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Buildah: This lightweight, open-source command-line tool for building and managing container images. It is an efficient alternative to Docker. With Buildah, you can build images in various ways, including using a Dockerfile, a podmanfile or by running commands in a container. Buildah is a flexible, secure and powerful tool for building container images. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub
Crane - Crane is a docker image builder to approach light-weight ML users who want to expand a container image with custom apt/conda/pip packages without writing any Dockerfile.