
Buildah
Podman
containerd
CRI-O
Crane
ZeroVM
BuildKit
LXD
GetProofAnchor
Proofsnap
GetProofAnchor is a web evidence platform that helps individuals, companies, legal teams, auditors, journalists, and investigators capture and preserve online content as verifiable digital proof.
Instead of relying on ordinary screenshots, GetProofAnchor creates a tamper-evident evidence bundle that can include a screenshot, video, captured HTML, extracted text, metadata, cryptographic hashes, a verification report, DNS, TLS and timestamping records. The goal is to make it easier to prove what existed online at a specific moment in time โ even if the page is later changed, deleted, edited, or disputed.
GetProofAnchor is designed for situations where online content matters: website changes, social media posts, public claims, misleading information, policy pages, competitor content, compliance records, online harassment, defamation, disputes, investigations, and regulatory documentation.
Each capture is built with integrity in mind. The evidence package can be independently reviewed, verified, and archived, helping users maintain a stronger chain of custody than a normal screenshot or browser printout. GetProofAnchor supports public web captures and is built with forensic-style documentation, auditability, and long-term verification in mind.
The platform is especially useful for lawyers, compliance teams, journalists, OSINT researchers, businesses, and anyone who needs reliable proof of online content before it disappears.
Buildah
GetProofAnchorNo features have been listed yet.
Based on our record, Buildah seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
Proofsnap - Preserve web pages as legally admissible evidence.
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes
Crane - Crane is a docker image builder to approach light-weight ML users who want to expand a container image with custom apt/conda/pip packages without writing any Dockerfile.
ZeroVM - ZeroVM is an open source virtualization technology that is based on the Chromium Native Client project.