
Which is more popular?
Polybar might be a bit more popular than bspwm. We know about 25 links to it since March 2021 and only 21 links to bspwm.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Polybar yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Switching To Bspwm - Initial Thoughts
More videos
[8e] | Polybar on i3
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using bspwm and Polybar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Support for multiple windows, limited support for EWMH, automatic mode for automatically determining the location of app tiles, and configuration and control via messages are among the characteristics of bspwm.
bspwm’s features include support for multiple windows, partial support for EWMH, automatic mode for automatically setting the position of app tiles, and it is configured and controlled through messages, among others.
We have no reviews of Polybar yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Over on Linux, I’ve been learning kinda a-lot about linux tools and workflows. I've recently got into window managers, bspwm was my first one and I'm thinking of moving towards a Arch+Hyprland setup in future. Setting it up was way... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Use BSPWM. It supports right clicks by default and its modular. You might want to look for status bars that work with it, slstatus does not work. Good luck, supremacist! Source: over 3 years ago
I had not heard of bspwm but I am a fan of telling WMs. Looking at the documentation now, I really like the pragmatic approach lol https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm. Source: over 3 years ago
I've been using Omarchy as my main setup since June 26, 2025, the day DHH released the first version. Before that I had my own custom Opinionated Linux, mclovin-ARCHived: an Arch + i3wm installer set up exactly the way I liked. It was... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
I'd like to just be able to write a short shell script to check if an exit node is in use, and then pipe that output into polybar which I use anyway. The problem is that I can't find an option in the tailscale Linux CLI client that will... Source: almost 3 years ago
I am on Arch Linux and I am using pywal to generate a colour palette from my wallpaper, which I then use throughout my system. In particular, I have a bash script which grabs these colours and uses them for polybar. The problem is that... Source: about 3 years ago
When comparing bspwm and Polybar, you can also consider the following products.

A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.
Compare i3 to bspwm or Polybar:

A Flexible toolkit for making desktop shells with QtQuick, targeting Wayland and X11.
Compare Quickshell to bspwm or Polybar:

Qtile is a full-featured, hackable tiling window manager written in Python.
Compare qtile to bspwm or Polybar:

git clone https://gitlab. com/o9000/tint2. git cd tint2 git checkout 16. 1 mkdir build cd build cmake ..
Compare tint2 to bspwm or Polybar:

dwm is a dynamic window manager for X. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for the application in use and the task performed.
Compare dwm to bspwm or Polybar:
Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.
Compare Yambar to bspwm or Polybar: