Quickshell VS bspwm

Compare Quickshell VS bspwm and see what are their differences

No screenshot yet

Rating: 0 reviews
Pricing: Open source

Alternatives Is it good?

Rating: 0 reviews

Alternatives Is it good?

Monitask

Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking sponsored

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, bspwm seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 21 times since March 2021.

social mentions: 0 vs 21
Productivity popularity: 45% vs 55%
alternatives listed: 41 vs 117

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

	Quickshell	bspwm
Website	quickshell.outfoxxed.me	github.com
Pricing	Open source	—
Listed in	Productivity Note Taking LMS App Launcher +1	Utilities Window Manager Linux Open Source +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Quickshell 4 features

bspwm 5 features

Ease of Use
Quickshell is designed to simplify the shell experience, making it more user-friendly for both beginners and advanced users.
Customization
The platform offers various customization options that allow users to tailor the interface and functionality to their specific needs.
Integration
Quickshell integrates well with other tools and services, providing a seamless workflow for users who rely on multiple applications.
Performance
It is optimized for speed and efficiency, ensuring that users can perform tasks quickly without unnecessary lag.

Possible disadvantages

Limited Advanced Features
While it is user-friendly, Quickshell may lack some of the advanced features that experienced developers might require.
Learning Curve
Despite its ease of use, there might still be a learning curve for users who are completely new to shell environments.
Platform Dependency
It might depend on specific platform requirements or compatibility, which could limit its usability across different systems.
Pricing
If there is a cost associated, price could be a barrier for users looking for a free alternative.

Highly Configurable
Bspwm is known for its high level of customizability, allowing users to tweak almost every aspect of their window management experience through simple scripts and configuration files.
Efficient Use of Screen Space
As a tiling window manager, Bspwm automatically arranges windows in a way that maximizes screen real estate, minimizing overlap and unused space.
Lightweight
Bspwm is extremely lightweight, making it suitable for older hardware and systems with limited resources. It does not come with additional software bloat.
Scriptable with Unix Philosophy
Bspwm adheres to the Unix philosophy of 'doing one thing well'. It functions without managing keybindings, allowing users to use other programs (like sxhkd) for keybinding management, which offers greater flexibility.
Active Community Support
Bspwm has an active community and comprehensive documentation, which helps new users get started and troubleshoot any issues they might encounter.

Possible disadvantages

Steep Learning Curve
The configuration process can be complex and overwhelming for beginners. Unlike more mainstream window managers, bspwm requires learning various scripts and commands.
Lack of GUI Configuration Tools
Bspwm does not come with graphical configuration tools, which might be inconvenient for users who prefer a GUI for managing settings.
Sparse on Built-in Features
Since bspwm follows the Unix philosophy closely, it lacks many built-in features and utilities that other window managers might offer. Users need to set up additional tools for tasks such as wallpaper management or system trays.
Compatibility Issues
Some applications that expect a floating window manager might not work well with bspwm, requiring extra configuration or using alternative software.
Limited Out-of-the-box Experience
Bspwm does not come with a pre-configured environment, which can be a disadvantage for users looking for a ready-to-use experience out of the box.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Quickshell

bspwm

Overall verdict

Quickshell is a solid, flexible toolkit for building custom desktop shells and widgets on Wayland (and X11) compositors using QtQuick/QML, making it a strong choice for Linux power users who want full control over their desktop environment.

Why this product is good

Built on QtQuick/QML, giving you a powerful and declarative way to design custom UI components
Designed to work with Wayland compositors like Hyprland, Sway, and others, filling a gap for customizable shells on modern Linux setups
Highly modular and hackable, letting you create bars, launchers, widgets, and other shell elements exactly how you want
Live-reloading and a developer-friendly workflow make iterating on your configuration faster
Open source and community-driven, with active development and documentation

Recommended for

Linux power users who want to build a fully custom desktop shell
Hyprland, Sway, and other Wayland compositor users seeking customizable bars and widgets
Developers comfortable with QML/QtQuick who enjoy tinkering with their environment
Ricing enthusiasts who want deep control over their desktop's look and behavior

Overall verdict

Yes, bspwm is generally considered to be a good window manager for users who value minimalism and customization. It is highly praised for its performance, simplicity, and the level of control it provides. However, it may not be the best choice for beginners due to the initial learning curve and the need for manual configuration.

Why this product is good

Bspwm is a tiling window manager that is highly configurable and minimalistic, designed to operate efficiently without relying on extensive system resources. It handles windows based on binary space partitioning, providing users with an easy way to organize their workspace. Its scriptability and flexibility allow users to tailor their environment precisely to their preferences, which is particularly appealing to advanced users who appreciate control over their system's behavior.

Recommended for

Advanced Linux users who prefer a minimalistic and efficient tiling window manager
Users who enjoy customizing their desktop environment and scripting configurations
Individuals who want to maximize screen real estate and improve their productivity through efficient workspace management

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Quickshell 2 videos + Add

bspwm 3 videos + Add

Is Quickshell Worth It?

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100

Quickshell

bspwm

45% 45%

Productivity

55% 55%

0% 0%

Window Manager

100% 100%

App Launcher

0% 0%

Linux

100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Quickshell and bspwm. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Quickshell no reviews yet

bspwm no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Quickshell yet. Be the first one to post

Top 13 Best Tiling Window Managers For Linux In 2022
www.hubtech.org · May 2022

Support for multiple windows, limited support for EWMH, automatic mode for automatically determining the location of app tiles, and configuration and control via messages are among the characteristics of bspwm.
13 Best Tiling Window Managers for Linux
www.tecmint.com · Jun 2020

bspwm’s features include support for multiple windows, partial support for EWMH, automatic mode for automatically setting the position of app tiles, and it is configured and controlled through messages, among others.

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Quickshell 0 mentions

bspwm 21 mentions

Tracking Quickshell since Jun 2025.

well... thinkpads are awesome
Over on Linux, I’ve been learning kinda a-lot about linux tools and workflows. I've recently got into window managers, bspwm was my first one and I'm thinking of moving towards a Arch+Hyprland setup in future. Setting it up was way... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
What WM should I use?
Use BSPWM. It supports right clicks by default and its modular. You might want to look for status bars that work with it, slstatus does not work. Good luck, supremacist! Source: over 3 years ago
What are some OpenSource apps that are the best of their kind?
I had not heard of bspwm but I am a fan of telling WMs. Looking at the documentation now, I really like the pragmatic approach lol https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm. Source: over 3 years ago

Alternatives to Quickshell and bspwm

When comparing Quickshell and bspwm, you can also consider the following products.

i

ironbar
Customisable Wayland gtk bar written in Rust.

Compare ironbar to Quickshell or bspwm:

ironbar vs Quickshell ironbar vs bspwm
i3
A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.

Compare i3 to Quickshell or bspwm:

i3 vs Quickshell i3 vs bspwm
Y

Yambar
Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.

Compare Yambar to Quickshell or bspwm:

Yambar vs Quickshell Yambar vs bspwm
qtile
Qtile is a full-featured, hackable tiling window manager written in Python.

Compare qtile to Quickshell or bspwm:

qtile vs Quickshell qtile vs bspwm
nwg-panel
Nwg-panel is a GTK3-based panel for sway and Hyprland Wayland compositors. The panel is equipped with a graphical configuration program that frees the user from the need to manually edit configuration files.

Compare nwg-panel to Quickshell or bspwm:

nwg-panel vs Quickshell nwg-panel vs bspwm
dwm
dwm is a dynamic window manager for X. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for the application in use and the task performed.

Compare dwm to Quickshell or bspwm:

dwm vs Quickshell dwm vs bspwm