Table of contents
Highly Configurable
Bspwm is known for its high level of customizability, allowing users to tweak almost every aspect of their window management experience through simple scripts and configuration files.
Efficient Use of Screen Space
As a tiling window manager, Bspwm automatically arranges windows in a way that maximizes screen real estate, minimizing overlap and unused space.
Lightweight
Bspwm is extremely lightweight, making it suitable for older hardware and systems with limited resources. It does not come with additional software bloat.
Scriptable with Unix Philosophy
Bspwm adheres to the Unix philosophy of 'doing one thing well'. It functions without managing keybindings, allowing users to use other programs (like sxhkd) for keybinding management, which offers greater flexibility.
Active Community Support
Bspwm has an active community and comprehensive documentation, which helps new users get started and troubleshoot any issues they might encounter.
Promote bspwm. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Yes, bspwm is generally considered to be a good window manager for users who value minimalism and customization. It is highly praised for its performance, simplicity, and the level of control it provides. However, it may not be the best choice for beginners due to the initial learning curve and the need for manual configuration.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if bspwm is good.
Check the traffic stats of bspwm on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of bspwm on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of bspwm's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of bspwm on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about bspwm on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Over on Linux, Iโve been learning kinda a-lot about linux tools and workflows. I've recently got into window managers, bspwm was my first one and I'm thinking of moving towards a Arch+Hyprland setup in future. Setting it up was way easier than I thought, and I got inspired by a YouTuber named jvscholz, whoโs all about minimalism and productivity. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Use BSPWM. It supports right clicks by default and its modular. You might want to look for status bars that work with it, slstatus does not work. Good luck, supremacist! Source: over 3 years ago
I had not heard of bspwm but I am a fan of telling WMs. Looking at the documentation now, I really like the pragmatic approach lol https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm. Source: over 3 years ago
I am not familiar with that distro at all, so no idea. KDE Plasma is fine, I use it myself (with BSPWM as my window manager, but that's irrelevant). Source: over 3 years ago
There's a paradigm shift required for a lot of people to start using automatic tiling window managers. Yabai is basically a bspwm port for MacOS and it follows the rules of binary space partitioning. In fact, bspwm has a great diagram on its github readme that illustrates how it works. This will limit the number of windows you can have on any given desktop. To overcome this limitation you use multiple desktops. A... Source: over 3 years ago
Itโs night and day. I also combine a heavily customized NeoVim config (https://github.com/tomit4/notes/tree/main/nvim) with a tiling window manager (https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm), the espanso text expander (https://espanso.org/), Vimium in the browser (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/), and a 40% ortholinear keyboard(https://drop.com/buy/planck-mechanical-keyboard). Source: over 3 years ago
Thanks a lot for your descriptive explanation on how to do this right! I really I'm grateful cos I definitely feel much more knowledgeable than how I was while I was figuring things out yesterday.i actually did try launching my script from within my window manager...i use bspwm and the scripts worked alright but the only issue I encountered was that it made my bspwm revert to its default config. Source: about 4 years ago
I have actually never used i3 myself, but unless it has option to listen for commands from a socket, you might better be served by bspwm. It is also a tiling manager, probably does not have all or same capabilities as i3, however, option to listen for commands on a socket make it a very good candidate for integration with Emacs. Since Emacs can easily read/write to sockets, you might write a client in elisp and... Source: about 4 years ago
Interesting question. I mix a lot. I use bspwm to create a window with a terminal for each individual project or general task. In kitty I group related functionality by tab and use layouts to position different applications that I want grouped (often development servers or server consoles). When working inside nvim I often use the built-in terminal for tasks related to the "code" (poke around, move stuff, create... Source: over 4 years ago
My personal favourite is bspwm and sxhkd, together it's super satisfying for some reason. Source: over 4 years ago
River is a dynamic wayland compositor that takes inspiration from Dwm and bspwm. Source: over 4 years ago
Try i3 or sway or bspwm, you can install them and switch to them from your session manager, you don't have to uninstall anything, and you can come back to regular Ubuntu anytime ;). Source: over 4 years ago
This is a great article and I remember reading it numerous times while I was implementing my own window manager. For someone interested in working on a really fun and rewarding hobby project a WM is a great one to look into since there are so many resources starting from really small implementations: - https://github.com/mackstann/tinywm - https://github.com/venam/2bwm - https://github.com/dylanaraps/sowm -... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Do you mean the binary division of the selected wmnode described in 'Manual Mode' here: https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm? So that the new window tiles inside the selected node with the window that formerly occupied the entire space? Source: almost 5 years ago
Bspwm is great too if you're interested in trying a tiling window manager. Have been using it almost exclusively for the last 2 years without too many problems. [1] https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
I don't know, I don't use Kitty. The socket-idea came to be because of BSPWM, which does something similar. Source: almost 5 years ago
Https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm if you look at bspwm upstream repo, there is default/example config, and so it is in freebsd package. Source: almost 5 years ago
I now run bspwm, along with sxhkd, picom, and lemonbar, as separate userland runit services; my .xinitrc now reads exec dbus-launch --exit-with-x11 runsvdir -P "${HOME}/.local/service/". Source: almost 5 years ago
I use bspwm with minimal config modifications, no window borders/headers, no panels, just the apps I use and keyboard hotkeys which I'm comfortable with. Source: about 5 years ago
What website? LXQT is actively maintained.. https://lxqt-project.org So is LXDE afaik. https://www.lxde.org BSPWM? At best slow development it seems.. https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm. Source: about 5 years ago
I use a minimalistic setup with bspwm, here's a demo of what it looks like. Source: over 5 years ago
BSPWM has carved a niche for itself in the landscape of open-source tiling window managers, particularly among Linux users seeking a highly customizable and efficient environment. Public opinion reveals that BSPWM enjoys a solid reputation but is tempered by some areas for improvement noted by its user base.
One of the most frequently mentioned strengths of BSPWM is its minimalist and modular design. Users appreciate its ability to handle multiple windows with ease. It also allows configuration and control via messages, which appeals to those who favor scripting and automation. This functionality gives it an edge in seamless integration with other tools, such as Emacs, leveraging its capability to listen to commands from sockets. Moreover, BSPWMโs partial support for Extended Window Manager Hints (EWMH) makes it compatible with several utilities and applications, although this limited support also signifies room for enhancement.
The learning curve associated with BSPWM is perceived as moderate, which aligns well with beginners experimenting with window managers and experienced users focusing on productivity. Many users, inspired by minimalism-enthusiast influencers, have found BSPWM's initial setup surprisingly straightforward. Nonetheless, it requires an adjustment in how one conceptualizes workspace management as BSPWM employs a binary space partitioning technique. This is compared to the paradigm shift required when using related tools like Yabai on macOS.
BSPWM is often contrasted with competitors such as i3, Sway, Xmonad, and others. While some users initially begin with BSPWM, they sometimes migrate to other managers like Hyprland or Sway in pursuit of additional features or more active development communities. This occasional transition might reflect in part BSPWM's slower development activity, as noted by some users lamenting a lack of recent updates. Despite this, a consistent base of users remains loyal due to its stable performance and simplicity.
The community surrounding BSPWM, though not as vibrant as some of its peers, provides sufficient resources through tools like GitHub, where example configurations can be found. Such documentation aids newcomers and keeps existing users engaged, enhancing the overall user experience. Users often discuss integrating BSPWM with peripherals such as Polybar and complementary applications like sxhkd for hotkey binding, highlighting its flexibility.
Overall, BSPWM maintains a reputation as a robust choice for users prioritizing minimalism, customization, and an efficient tiling approach to window management. While its slower development pace may be a concern for some, its core functionalities and philosophical alignment with open-source principles continue to endear it to a dedicated user segment.
Do you know an article comparing bspwm to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is bspwm good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss bspwm here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
