Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Bourne Again SHell VS bpython

Compare GNU Bourne Again SHell VS bpython and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GNU Bourne Again SHell logo GNU Bourne Again SHell

Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

bpython logo bpython

bpython is a fancy interface to the Python interpreter for Unix-like operating systems (I hear it...
  • GNU Bourne Again SHell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • bpython Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-03

GNU Bourne Again SHell features and specs

  • Compatibility
    Bash is highly compatible with sh, the original Bourne Shell, making it easy for users familiar with other Unix-like systems to adapt.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Bash supports a wide range of scripting functionalities, including command substitution, variables, and control structures, making it powerful for complex scripting tasks.
  • Widespread Usage
    Bash is the default shell for many Linux distributions and macOS, ensuring widespread availability and community support.
  • Interactive Use
    Bash offers interactive features such as command line editing, history substitution, and tab completion, enhancing user productivity.
  • Strong Community and Resources
    There is a robust community around Bash, providing a wealth of resources including documentation, tutorials, and forums for support.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Bourne Again SHell

  • Performance Overhead
    When compared to newer shells like Zsh or Fish, Bash can have slower performance due to its older architecture and design.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Bash lacks some of the advanced features and improvements found in other modern shells, such as better autocomplete functionality and enhanced scripting syntax.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The robust feature set of Bash can be overwhelming to new users, especially those unfamiliar with command-line interfaces.
  • Error Handling
    Bash scripts can be prone to errors if not carefully handled, as it has limited debugging facilities compared to languages specifically designed for scripting.

bpython features and specs

  • Autocomplete Feature
    bpython offers an intelligent autocomplete feature that predicts and suggests completions for code, which can speed up development by reducing the amount of typing needed.
  • Syntax Highlighting
    This interpreter provides syntax highlighting, making it easier for developers to read and understand code by color-coding different elements such as keywords, strings, and variables.
  • Integrated Documentation
    bpython allows users to easily access Python documentation directly from the interpreter, which helps to quickly reference function signatures and documentation without leaving the environment.
  • Replay Functionality
    Users can replay their session to see what commands were run, helping to keep track of changes made during coding sessions, making debugging and learning from past sessions much easier.
  • Friendly User Interface
    bpython provides an enhanced console interface that is more user-friendly compared to the standard Python interpreter, with features like in-line syntax highlighting and color-coded warnings and errors.

Possible disadvantages of bpython

  • Limited Support for Advanced Features
    It might not support some of the advanced features and libraries that other more complex environments (like Jupyter or full IDEs) might provide, potentially limiting its use for more advanced programming tasks.
  • Performance Overhead
    The additional features like syntax highlighting and autocomplete can introduce some performance overhead, which might not be desirable for users who prefer a fast, minimalistic environment.
  • Dependency Management
    Since bpython runs within a terminal environment, managing dependencies can sometimes be cumbersome, especially when working with projects that require specific environments or packages.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    While offering many useful features, new Python users might initially find the interface overwhelming or confusing compared to the traditional Python interpreter.
  • Stability Issues
    Some users might experience occasional stability issues or unexpected behavior when using bpython, particularly when experimenting with more complex Python code or environments.

GNU Bourne Again SHell videos

No GNU Bourne Again SHell videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

bpython videos

+ Add

Bpython - alternative interactive python interpreter

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Bourne Again SHell and bpython)

GNU Bourne Again SHell

bpython

Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
Cryptocurrencies
0% 0
Python IDE
0 0%
Python IDE
100% 100
Blockchain
100 100%
Blockchain
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Bourne Again SHell and bpython. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bpython seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Bourne Again SHell mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Bourne Again SHell yet. Tracking of GNU Bourne Again SHell recommendations started around Mar 2021.

bpython mentions (7)

  • What dev tools do you use in your python projects?
    Yeah, also it's worth to mention bpython. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Release of IPython 8.0
    Yeah, mostly I lack time to catch up with Jonathan Slenders works, and have stronger backward compatibility requirements. b=But ptpython and pyipython are both great. I should also look into Rich and Textual https://bpython-interpreter.org/ is also another alternative python shell, and of course https://xon.sh. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Need help setting up python on arch linux
    Python comes with IDLE as /usr/bin/idle but it doesn't have a corresponding .desktop file that would let it appear in the application menu. Otherwise, /usr/bin/python has an interactive mode and bpython is a wrapper around that interactive mode that has like syntax highlighting, indenting, undo, etc. Source: over 3 years ago
  • PyCharm console
    Someone posted bpython which I'm pretty ecstatic about but always good to know options. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • PyCharm console
    Someone else posted this - bpython - which is what I was looking for. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Bourne Again SHell and bpython, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

iPython - iPython provides a rich toolkit to help you make the most out of using Python interactively.

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

IDLE - Default IDE which come installed with the Python programming language.

PowerShell Plus - Learn how to learn and master PowerShell fast with an interactive learning center, a powerful IDE, pre-loaded scripts, and a PowerShell Editor… all for free.

ptpython - a better Python REPL

Loading...