ASP.NET Core VS pkgsrc
Compare ASP.NET Core VS pkgsrc and see what are their differences
A unified, OpenAI-compatible gateway to every major LLM provider. One endpoint, one key, one bill - with automatic routing and failover.
sponsored
ASP.NET Core
B4X
Django
ASP.NET
Flask
ExpressJS
Laravel
Play Framework
pkgsrc
Conda
Homebrew
Yay
Portage
Nix
Docker
BBEdit
ASP.NET Core pkgsrcBased on our record, pkgsrc should be more popular than ASP.NET Core. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
However, usage of a C# framework like ASP .NET Core or a Java framework like OfficeFloor are more than capable in the right hands. The key is to understand the tradeoffs of each language and framework, and to choose the right tool for the job. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
The administration UI is now built on React and ASP.NET Core which means it's fast ๐! - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Per https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/learn/aspnet/what-is-aspnet-core, "ASP.NET Core is the open-source version of ASP.NET, that runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows. ASP.NET Core was first released in 2016 and is a re-design of earlier Windows-only versions of ASP.NET.". Source: almost 4 years ago
But how about you both get your wishes: ASP.NET Core? Use a Linux server - with which you are familiar with, to host the live/production version. And the web application itself can be locally developed and tested in ASP.NET on a Windows server, which is what your boss wants? Source: almost 5 years ago
Letโs remember that ASP.NET Core is cross-platform and can run practically anywhere. If you find yourself using C # for all your development, this is probably the best scenario for you to use anyway. With it, you can deploy your web application, which would also contain your Blazor Wasm assets in the same location. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
> Most open source software packages are also compiled for BSD variants, they switched to 64 bit time_t a long time ago and reported back upstream any problems. * NetBSD in 2012: https://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal-6/NetBSD-6.0.html * OpenBSD in 2014: http://www.openbsd.org/55.html For packaging, NetBSD uses their (multi-platform) Pkgsrc, which has 29,000 packages, which probably covers a large swath of... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> https://pkgsrc.smartos.org/install-on-macos/ Note that Pkgsrc is a NetBSD-derived project. * https://pkgsrc.org The Joyent folks leveraged it to allow their customers, who were perhaps not as familiar with Solaris/SmartOS, a larger pool of packages. Pkgsrc was running on Solaris before Joyent, Joyent built on top of it. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Https://pkgsrc.org/ from netbsd runs on many systems. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
It seems according to pkgsrc.org that pkgin might follow the PKG_PATH environment variable. You're supposed to set PKG_PATH="http://cdn.NetBSD.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$(uname -p)/$(uname -r|cut -f '1 2' -d.)/All/", and according to uname(1), -p gives the processor architecture and -r gives the operating system [kernel] release. Source: over 3 years ago
It seems like pkgsrc.org hasnโt got the news yet. Source: over 3 years ago
B4X - Cross platform development tools for native iOS, Android, desktop and server applications.
Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.
Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS
ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.