Creative Commons VS Open Science Framework

First, when I say open project, I mean, any project released under a license like GPL, any Open Source license, or a Creative Commons license. Not every project involves software development. There are projects that are related to the creation of multimedia content, like images, text, audio or video, and if you want that anyone has access, can redistribute the material or create derivative work, as it happens with... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

You can also look for assets under Creative Commons licenses (though you'll need to research the licenses as some require attribution or don't allow use in anything commercial or etc). Source: 5 months ago

You'll need to pick a specific license, not just generic open source. For this kind of thing, the usual recommendation is a creative commons liscence. They have a handy little tool to help you figure out which license is best for you. Source: 10 months ago

Regardless, there's a broader "free culture" movement with things like the Creative Commons licenses, etc facilitating a similar approach to other kinds of IP, like movies, music, etc. There are special open source licenses tailored to fonts and a whole ecosystem of open source fonts, for example. Source: 12 months ago

This is the entire reason the Creative Commons project exists: Copyright law is extremely strict, and CC licenses provide artists with an easy way to be more permissive with the rights to their works, while still being selective about what rights they retain, and while still remaining compliant with copyright law.... Source: 12 months ago

Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and publishes his research and related artifacts there, which I really appreciate! [1] https://www.econtalk.org/a-users-guide-to-our-emotional-thermostat-with-adam-mastroianni/. - Source: Hacker News / 30 days ago

Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're based on your Google Scholar record and alerts, so I guess you'll need both/one of those for it to work. https://scholar.google.com Second, Scopus from Elsevier (a company that plenty... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those the author performed. There was so much talk of needing this post-"replication crisis.". - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

2.Open Science Framework - A non-profit (but not open source) "GitHub for scientific research" [4]. OSF is an incredible team and and product, that helps scientists openly publish their papers, datasets, code, and other research outputs. Their website is also geared towards a technical audience too - they help scientists store information, but they don't have a feature that helps users discover discuss new... Source: 10 months ago

Our headline result is that a 10 percent increase in taxes is associated with a decrease in annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of approximately −0.2 percent when bundled as part of a TaxNegative tax-spending-deficit combination. The same tax increase is associated with an increase in annual GDP growth of approximately 0.2 percent when part of a TaxPositive fiscal policy package. All of our data, output,... Source: 10 months ago