
SCI-HUB
Google Scholar
PubMed.gov
Unpaywall
Archive.org
Z-Lib
Pointer Pointer
arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for scholarly articles.

NovoPsych
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures by secure link and review scored results, severity bands and reports.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, arXiv seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 334 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | arxiv.org | clientforms.app |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of arXiv yet.
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures such as the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and DASS-21 by secure link and get scored results, severity bands and reports ready to review. The catalogue also includes DSM-5 ADHD assessments and autism screening tools....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Students, researchers, and academics in scientific fields who are looking for early access to research outputs or wish to publish their own preprints for peer feedback. It's also beneficial for anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge developments in science and technology.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to submit a paper to arxiv
More videos
No ClientForms.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing arXiv and ClientForms.app.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Frontend: Next.js 15 (React 19), Tailwind CSS Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security) Authentication: Clerk Payments: Stripe Hosting: Vercel (Sydney region) Database hosting: Supabase (Australian data residency)
ClientForms.app's answer:
Psychologists who assess ADHD and autism. Typically private practice, solo or small group (1-5 clinicians), currently using paper forms and spending hours on admin per assessment. They want something that works and is secure.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Neurodivergent-first design. Most digital forms just replicate paper online. ClientForms is built specifically for ADHD and autism patients - progress bars with time remaining (helps with time blindness), softer colours instead of harsh white, sticky headers so you always know where you are. The forms are designed to reduce anxiety and improve completion rates.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Most clinical software treats patients as an afterthought. ClientForms is designed specifically for neurodivergent users who are filling out the forms, progress indicators, time estimates, calmer colours, predictable layouts. One link, no signup required, works on any device. Patients just open and complete.
Share your experience with using arXiv and ClientForms.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


The evaluation landscape for AI agents saw 45+ new research papers in the past 6 months on arXiv (Cornell University's open-access preprint repository), proposing new metrics for trajectory quality (TRACE), hallucination detection (LSC),... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I depend heavily on arxiv papers for this. Using a SERP API (Bright Data) for Google, running site:arxiv.org plus a well-framed query gets me recent, relevant papers. I’d run four or five of these, collate the results…and then inevitably... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
ArXiv — Repositorio del paper "Spec-Driven Development: From Code to Contract in the Age of AI" (enero 2026). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Tracking ClientForms.app since Dec 2025.
When comparing arXiv and ClientForms.app, you can also consider the following products.

It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Compare SCI-HUB to arXiv or ClientForms.app:

NovoPsych is a tool that is used for outcome monitoring via conducting psychological tests online.
Compare NovoPsych to arXiv or ClientForms.app:

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
Compare Google Scholar to arXiv or ClientForms.app:

PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
Compare PubMed.gov to arXiv or ClientForms.app:

Legally read research papers behind paywalls.
Compare Unpaywall to arXiv or ClientForms.app:

Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library offering free universal access to books, movies...
Compare Archive.org to arXiv or ClientForms.app: