
Raindrop.io
wallabag
Archive.org
Wayback Machine
Pinboard
Instapaper
HTTrack
The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

GitLab
BitBucket
VS Code
Git
Treehouse
Pantheon
CodePen
Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, GitHub seems to be a lot more popular than ArchiveBox. While we know about 2484 links to GitHub, we've tracked only 94 mentions of ArchiveBox.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | archivebox.io | github.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2017 | Startup from the United States · 500 - 999 employees · 2008 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...
No description of GitHub yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and GitHub.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.
Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.
Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.
Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.
Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.
If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.
If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.
ArchiveBox's answer
Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and GitHub. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ArchiveBox yet. Be the first one to post
GitHub is an essential platform for modern software development. It makes it easy to host, manage, and collaborate on code while providing powerful tools for version control, project management, and team...
GitHub Discussions is a communication forum for the community around an open source or internal project. Discussions enable fluid, open conversation in a public forum. Discussions are transparent and accessible, but...
However, like any (human) product, the platform has its limits, downsides, and critics. GitHub has been barred by certain governments, and even if that isn’t exactly the company’s fault, the users are the ones limited...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / 11 days ago
A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
I run an ArchiveBox instance locally. Recommended! https://archivebox.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
For developers who cannot access Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8 offers the best alternative. Integrating this model into your daily workflow is straightforward, especially when using modern development platforms like GitHub for repository... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
1228 push attempts died with fatal: could not read Username for 'https://github.com' — an https remote with no credential helper and no stored Credentials. First one 2026-07-21T20:48:03Z, still failing as I write this. Thirty-nine Days. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
They can include the protocol, it’s that regardless of what’s put in there it’ll use https, which is explained with examples both in the following sentences and then in more detail in a linked doc. > For repositories on GitHub, GitLab,... - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
When comparing ArchiveBox and GitHub, you can also consider the following products.

All your articles, photos, video & content from web & apps in one place.
Compare Raindrop.io to ArchiveBox or GitHub:

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to ArchiveBox or GitHub:


Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to ArchiveBox or GitHub:

Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library offering free universal access to books, movies...
Compare Archive.org to ArchiveBox or GitHub:

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
Compare VS Code to ArchiveBox or GitHub: