AppyPie VS D (Programming Language)

• Ease of Use
  AppyPie AppMakr offers a user-friendly interface with a drag-and-drop builder, making it accessible for users with little to no coding experience.
• Multiplatform Support
  The platform allows you to create apps for multiple platforms including iOS, Android, and Windows, all from a single build.
• Cost-Effective
  Offers affordable pricing plans compared to custom app development, making it a budget-friendly option for small businesses and startups.
• Pre-built Templates
  Provides a wide variety of pre-designed templates specific to different industries, which can save time and effort in the design process.
• Integration with Third-Party Services
  Supports integration with various third-party services like social media apps, payment gateways, and analytics tools to enhance app functionality.
• Customer Support
  AppyPie offers customer support through various channels including chat, email, and phone, helping users resolve issues quickly.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Customization
  While the drag-and-drop interface is easy to use, it can also limit the extent to which users can customize their apps compared to programming from scratch.
• Performance
  Apps built on AppyPie may not perform as well as native apps coded from scratch, particularly in terms of speed and responsiveness.
• Dependency on Platform
  Users are dependent on AppyPie for updates, bug fixes, and new features, which can be limiting if the platform does not evolve fast enough.
• Subscription Costs
  Although the plans are affordable, the recurring subscription fees can add up over time, especially if you require advanced features.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  While basic features are easy to implement, using more advanced functionalities may still require some learning and technical know-how.
• Data Ownership
  There can be concerns regarding data ownership and privacy, as your app and its data are hosted on their platform.

• Performance
  D is designed to be a high-performance systems programming language, offering performance comparable to C and C++ through native machine code compilation.
• Expressiveness
  D features a rich standard library and modern language constructs, such as garbage collection, first-class arrays, and advanced templating, making it easier to write expressive and maintainable code.
• Memory Safety
  D offers optional garbage collection along with manual memory management. This hybrid approach can help in developing safer applications by reducing memory-related errors.
• Interoperability
  D can easily interoperate with C API, enabling seamless integration with existing C libraries and systems. It also supports better C++ interoperability compared to other languages.
• Built-in Unit Testing
  D has built-in support for unit tests, allowing developers to write and run tests as part of the language itself, facilitating test-driven development.
• Concurrency
  D offers built-in concurrency support with message passing, similar to the actor model found in languages like Erlang, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs.

Possible disadvantages

• Adoption
  D is not as widely adopted as other languages like C, C++, or Java. This limited adoption means fewer libraries, frameworks, and community support.
• Toolchain Maturity
  While D's compilers and tools have improved over the years, they may still lack the maturity and feature set of more established languages, which can affect developer productivity.
• Learning Curve
  D's richness and combination of paradigms (such as imperative, object-oriented, and functional programming) can present a steep learning curve for new developers.
• Garbage Collection
  Although D offers optional garbage collection, its reliance on it for memory safety might be seen as a drawback for real-time system development where deterministic memory management is crucial.
• Ecosystem
  The ecosystem for D is less vibrant compared to more popular languages, leading to potentially fewer third-party libraries, tools, and resources.
• Standard Library Documentation
  The standard library documentation can be inconsistent or less comprehensive compared to other languages, making it difficult for developers to fully utilize all features of the language.

No AppyPie videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

D Language Tutorial

• THE BEST 34 APP DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE IN 2022 LIST
  www.edigitalagency.com.au · Jul 2022

  Allows anyone with no technical knowledge to create advanced applications for mobiles and smartphones. Nothing to Download or Install, no programming required, just drag & drop. AppyPie has more than 5000 apps...

We have no reviews of D (Programming Language) yet. Be the first one to post

Tracking AppyPie since Mar 2021.

• Ask HN: What is your (AI) dev tech stack / workflow? (June 2026)

  I've spent 2 weeks (2-4h per day) to make D language[1] version of Sciter SDK [2] Choice of AI "tooling" was by accident - typed something like "how to define copy constructor in D for custom structure" in Microsoft's Copilot in Edge... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go

  > Mostly, I am not really trying to compete with C/C++/Rust on speed, but I'm not going to add a GC either. So I'm somewhere in there. Out of curiosity, how would you compare the goals of Rue with something like D[0] or one of the... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Pony: An actor-model, capabilities-secure, high-performance programming language

  The D language home page has something similar with a drop down with code examples https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

View more