Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Application Load Balance VS Azure File Storage

Compare Application Load Balance VS Azure File Storage and see what are their differences

Application Load Balance logo Application Load Balance

Automatically distribute incoming traffic across multiple targets using an Application Load Balancer.

Azure File Storage logo Azure File Storage

Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.
  • Application Load Balance Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-05
  • Azure File Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11

Application Load Balance features and specs

  • Layer 7 Processing
    Application Load Balancer operates at the application layer (Layer 7), allowing it to make routing decisions based on advanced content-based rules, such as the HTTP headers, request URL, and query string.
  • Advanced Routing
    ALB supports dynamic host-based and path-based routing, enabling requests to be dispatched to different backend services based on the URL pattern or the host domain, which is particularly useful for microservices architectures.
  • WebSocket and HTTP/2 Support
    Supports sticky sessions and WebSocket, allowing for long-lived sessions and bidirectional communication between clients and servers. It also supports HTTP/2, providing improved performance over HTTP/1.1.
  • Integrated Security Features
    ALB integrates with AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) to secure applications and protect against common web exploits. It also supports TLS offloading, simplifying encryption management.
  • Monitoring and Logging
    Offers detailed CloudWatch metrics and logs to monitor traffic patterns, latency, and other critical operational details. This helps in proactively troubleshooting and optimizing performance.

Possible disadvantages of Application Load Balance

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring ALB might be more complex compared to Network Load Balancers or Classic Load Balancers, especially with intricate routing and security rules.
  • Higher Costs
    Application Load Balancers can be more expensive due to advanced features and capabilities, particularly when handling high traffic levels, compared to simpler load balancing solutions.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    ALB is primarily designed for HTTP/HTTPS traffic and may not be suitable if your application needs to handle TCP/UDP-based protocols directly.
  • Performance Overhead
    Operating at Layer 7 can introduce slight latency due to the additional processing required for content-based routing and SSL termination.

Azure File Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure File Storage can seamlessly scale up to support your data storage needs without sacrificing performance, ensuring that businesses can grow without concerns about storage limitations.
  • Managed Service
    As a fully managed service, Azure takes care of the maintenance, updates, and infrastructure, reducing administrative overhead for IT teams, and allowing them to focus on other business-critical tasks.
  • Integration
    Azure File Storage integrates well with other Microsoft products such as Windows Server and other Azure services, enabling a cohesive and efficient ecosystem for consistent and smooth user experiences.
  • Access Control
    Provides robust access control through Azure Active Directory, setting up specific permissions, ensuring that data remains secure and only accessible to authorized users.
  • Cross-platform Access
    Supports the SMB protocol, allowing access from various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, enabling diverse environments to interact seamlessly with the storage service.

Possible disadvantages of Azure File Storage

  • Cost
    Costs can accumulate rapidly, especially in scenarios involving large volumes of data, frequent access, or high redundancy, potentially leading to substantial operational expenses.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    The pricing model can be complex with various tiers and charges based on operations, data redundancy, and outbound data transfer, making it difficult to predict the exact costs effectively.
  • Latency
    While generally fast, there can be latency issues, particularly in situations where files are accessed from regions that are geographically distant from the storage location, affecting performance.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to on-premise solutions, there is limited capacity for customization of the infrastructure and may not meet specific needs of certain businesses that require tailor-made setups.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    Azure File Storage relies on stable internet connectivity, which can be a risk for businesses situated in areas with unstable networks or outages, impacting the ability to access data.

Application Load Balance videos

AWS ALB | AWS Application Load Balancer | What is Application Load Balancer AWS | Intellipaat

More videos:

  • Review - Step by Step Instructions to setup Application Load Balancer | what is AWS Application Load Balancer

Azure File Storage videos

No Azure File Storage videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Application Load Balance and Azure File Storage)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
9 9%
91% 91
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Application Load Balance and Azure File Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Application Load Balance should be more popular than Azure File Storage. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Application Load Balance mentions (23)

  • Authenticating users in the load balancer with Cognito
    Say that we have an application running behind a public-facing Application Load Balancer (ALB). The load balancer's target can be any supported target, including ECS containers, EC2 instances or even Lambda functions. Because the application is only available to authenticated users, we want to find a solution to identify them. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • A Practical Guide To Deploying A Complex, Production Level, Three-tier Architecture On AWS
    The Load balancer is the entry point to the application. The Application Load Balancer, residing in the presentation layer, will route traffic through the AutoScaling Group to logic-tier instances residing in the logic layer. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • The RoboNet Artificial Media Protocol - How a new internet protocol can make AI regulation more human
    Eg. AWS can have their Load Balancer tuned for OSI layer 7 rules for ramp content, exactly what everyone would need to redirect RAMP headers/signatures/etc straight into its proper routes/servers. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Creating Application Load Balancer rules for fast feature stack deployments
    The service in question uses ECS Fargate behind a private Application Load Balancer (ALB). The engineering team placed an HTTP API Gateway before the ALB that performs the authentication. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Introduction to Cloud Load-Balancers
    What is an Application Load Balancer? Https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/latest/application/introduction.html. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

Azure File Storage mentions (15)

  • Show HN: ZeroFS, the Filesystem That Makes S3 Your Primary Storage
    > You're also mounting it from Linux, which is just... weird. Nobody (for some values of nobody) does this. The sole purpose for this service is to provide backwards-compatible file shares for Windows servers and desktops. That's not what Azure's marketing material says: Serverless file shares "Store your files on a distributed file system built from the ground up to be highly available and durable." "Take... - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago
  • A Step by Step Guide on How to Migrate from AWS to Azure
    If your workloads require shared storage, Azure Files is a nice pick. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Searching for online alternative for a synology
    Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How To Upload and Delete files in Azure Blob Storage Using Blazor Apps With .NET 7
    โ€‹To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Hosted, mappable storage?
    If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Application Load Balance and Azure File Storage, you can also consider the following products

Amazon API Gateway - Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale

Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

Amazon Route 53 - Amazon Route 53 is a highly available and scalable DNS web service.

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage