Route 53 is recommended for businesses and developers who require a scalable and reliable DNS solution. It is particularly beneficial for those already using AWS services, as it offers seamless integration and management capabilities. It is also suitable for organizations aiming to achieve high availability and low latency in their DNS management.
No Azure File Storage videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Amazon Route 53 should be more popular than Azure File Storage. It has been mentiond 50 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
So far our high level architecture diagram wasn't very impressive - we only used AWS Amplify service to host our web application. Of course there are many services under the hood like Route 53, CloudFront, Certificate Manager, Lambda and S3, but Amplify provides level of abstraction, so that we don't have to think about it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Next, I configured Amazon Route 53 to manage the DNS for my domain. I created a hosted zone for kelechiedeh.info and set up an alias record pointing my domain to the CloudFront distribution. Route 53 provides a reliable way to route traffic to my S3-hosted website. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
AWS CloudFront is the star of the show here. It caches static content (like media, scripts, and images) to ensure fast, reliable delivery. Other AWS services that run at the edge include Route 53 for DNS routing, Shield and WAF for security, and even Lambda via Lambda@Edge โ giving you the ability to run serverless logic closer to the user. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
If you donโt have a domain, you can register one directly through AWS Route 53. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Optionally โ Amazon Route 53 domain mapping for the API endpoints using Amazon CloudFront distribution. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
> You're also mounting it from Linux, which is just... weird. Nobody (for some values of nobody) does this. The sole purpose for this service is to provide backwards-compatible file shares for Windows servers and desktops. That's not what Azure's marketing material says: Serverless file shares "Store your files on a distributed file system built from the ground up to be highly available and durable." "Take... - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago
If your workloads require shared storage, Azure Files is a nice pick. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: over 2 years ago
โTo know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: over 2 years ago
Cloudflare DNS - Install the free app that makes your phoneโs Internet more fast, private, and reliable.
Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.
Google Cloud DNS - Reliable, resilient, low-latency DNS serving from Googleโs worldwide network of Anycast DNS servers.
Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.
ClouDNS - ClouDNS is a platform that allows users to keep their websites, data, and network security all the time.
Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage