AppFollow VS git-sizer

• Comprehensive Analytics
  AppFollow provides extensive app performance metrics and detailed analytics, which can help users understand their app’s performance and user reviews in depth.
• Review Management
  The platform offers robust review management tools, allowing users to monitor, analyze, and respond to user feedback directly from the dashboard, making customer interaction more streamlined.
• Keyword Tracking
  AppFollow includes keyword tracking features that help users improve their app's visibility by identifying the most effective keywords for their app’s ASO strategy.
• Competitor Analysis
  Users can track competitors' apps and get insights into their performance and strategies. This helps in making informed decisions to stay ahead in the market.
• Integrations
  AppFollow supports integration with various tools and platforms like Slack, Zendesk, and others, facilitating smoother workflow and collaboration.

Possible disadvantages

• Pricing
  The service can be quite expensive, especially for startups and small businesses that might find the cost prohibitive.
• Complexity
  The platform can be complex to navigate for new users, with a steep learning curve that might require additional time and resources to fully utilize.
• Customization Limitations
  Some users have noted that there are limitations in customizing reports and dashboards, which might not cater to all specific business needs.
• Limited Free Plan
  The free plan offers very limited functionalities, which may not be sufficient for users who need more comprehensive features and insights.
• Support Response Time
  There have been instances where users reported slower response times from customer support, which can be a drawback in time-sensitive situations.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

ASO Tool for Keyword Research (AppFollow Review)

More videos

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• ASOScan vs. the rest: every direct comparison
  asoscan.com · Sep 2026

  COMPARE / INDEX ASOScan vs.the rest.6comparisons100%public pricing data0cherry-picked tables01AppTweakASOScan vs AppTweak: 6× more keywords per dollar. See the full comparison →02MobileActionASOScan vs MobileAction:...

We have no reviews of git-sizer yet. Be the first one to post

Tracking AppFollow since Mar 2021.

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago