
ZoomInfo
Lusha
Hunter.io
Instantly.ai
lemlist
Clearbit
Snov.io
Apollo’s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.

Firecrawl
Oxylabs
Apify
Bright Data
ScrapeHunt
Scrapy
ZenRows
Web scraping API for sites that block other scrapers
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Apollo.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 69 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | apollo.io | usestring.ai |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United States | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of useString.ai yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Free software to find email addresses - apollo.io review
More videos
No useString.ai videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Apollo.io and useString.ai.
useString.ai's answer:
String is a New York company building web-data infrastructure, turning the messy public web into accurate, usable data. Web Access is the part that actually gets pages back from sites that block other tools. It’s available as a standalone API and a hosted MCP server.
useString.ai's answer:
It gets through sites that block other scrapers and only bills requests that succeed. In an open benchmark of 17 scraping APIs on 100 bot-protected sites, String had the highest success rate at 98.6%, and the method and raw data are public. It picks the proxy and rendering method for each page itself, so developers don’t manage proxies or retries.
useString.ai's answer:
The best reason is reliability on hard sites: highest success rate in our open benchmark, and blocked requests aren’t billed. There’s nothing to configure, since proxies, rendering and captcha handling are chosen automatically. It returns clean Markdown, HTML or JSON, also offers web search and site mapping, and has a hosted MCP server for agents in Claude and Cursor. Pricing is public, and new accounts get $5 of free credit (about 20,000 fetches), no card needed.
useString.ai's answer:
Developers and data teams building AI agents, data products and pipelines that need live web data, especially from sites with strong bot protection. Typical uses are alternative data, pricing and inventory monitoring, talent and job data, real estate listings, and giving AI agents web access.
useString.ai's answer:
The service runs on managed cloud browsers and a proxy network, with automatic routing per request. The MCP server is open source and written in TypeScript. It exposes a REST API and an MCP endpoint, with SDK-free access from curl, Python and Node.
useString.ai's answer:
YipitData Revelio Labs DataWeave Sachem Head Canary Data Pararius Appsmith
Share your experience with using Apollo.io and useString.ai. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Apollo documents zero-credit People API Search for eligible accounts. It returns candidate information without email or phone values. People Enrichment uses different rules and can charge for returned data. Waterfall...
The right Apollo alternative fixes the part of Apollo that costs you meetings. Bad data calls for a better database, and a missing channel calls for a specialist tool next to Apollo.
What is the best AI prospecting tool for B2B sales in 2026? The best tool depends on your team's specific situation. toflow.ai is a strong fit for multi-channel outreach across email, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp, and is...
We have no reviews of useString.ai yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2–8 seconds of... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Tracking useString.ai since Nov 2026.
When comparing Apollo.io and useString.ai, you can also consider the following products.

ZoomInfo is a B2B database providing detailed business information on people and companies.
Compare ZoomInfo to Apollo.io or useString.ai:



A web intelligence collection platform and premium proxy provider, enabling companies of all sizes to utilize the power of big data.
Compare Oxylabs to Apollo.io or useString.ai:

Find all the email addresses related to a domain
Compare Hunter.io to Apollo.io or useString.ai:

Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.
Compare Apify to Apollo.io or useString.ai: