Apollo.io VS CodeAI
Compare Apollo.io VS CodeAI and see what are their differences
VocaIQ deploys AI voice agents that answer every call, book appointments, and qualify leads 24/7. From $297/month. Live demo at vocaiq.ai/demo.
featured
Apollo.io
ZoomInfo
Lusha
Hunter.io
Instantly.ai
Clearbit
lemlist
Snov.io
CodeAI
Cursor
Gaman-ai.vercel.app
Claude Code
ParakeetAI
AgentGPT
interviewing.io
CodeMaker AI
Apollo.io CodeAINo CodeAI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
We use Apollo with our Sales and BDR team to manage our cold outreach. The strength of the platform is the sequences and cadences that you can set up. Compared to other tools we have used in the past like Salesloft the UI is much easier to navigate. The main limitation is that the quality of data isn't as vast and often I can find prospects on Linkedin but not in Apollo.
Based on our record, Apollo.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 69 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Last year I ran the same LinkedIn Sales Navigator export through three enrichment APIs. Apollo matched 61% of the emails. Hunter.io matched 54%. An OSINT-first pipeline I'd built in n8n โ pulling from public sources before hitting any paid API โ matched 79% and cost roughly $0.003 per contact. The delta wasn't magic. It was sequence. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Despite having its LinkedIn Page removed in 2025, Apollo remains a functional enrichment and outreach platform with 275M+ contacts. The free tier includes 10,000 credits and the $49/month basic plan is the cheapest entry point for a combined enrichment-plus-sequencing workflow. Apollo's data collection methods have attracted LinkedIn's attention, but the product continues to operate. The risk I'd assign it:... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
ZoomInfo - ZoomInfo is a B2B database providing detailed business information on people and companies.
Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Gaman-ai.vercel.app - AI Code Agent, no-subscription alternative to Claude Code. It runs real programming tasks using tools like shell commands, file operations, web access, and MCP integrations.
Hunter.io - Find all the email addresses related to a domain
Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebaseโno more context switching, just breakthrough results.