Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Thrift VS Apache CXF

Compare Apache Thrift VS Apache CXF and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. sponsored
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Thrift logo Apache Thrift

An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index
  • Apache Thrift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-12
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29

Apache Thrift features and specs

  • Cross-Language Support
    Apache Thrift supports numerous programming languages including Java, Python, C++, Ruby, and more, enabling seamless communication between services written in different languages.
  • Efficient Serialization
    Thrift offers efficient binary serialization which helps in reducing the payload size and improves the communication speed between services.
  • Service Definition Flexibility
    Thrift provides a robust interface definition language (IDL) for defining and generating code for services with strict type checking, fostering strong contract interfaces.
  • Scalability
    Due to its lightweight and efficient serialization mechanisms, Apache Thrift can handle a large number of simultaneous client connections, making it suitable for scalable distributed systems.
  • Versioning Support
    Thrift supports service versioning which helps in evolving APIs without disrupting existing services or clients.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Thrift

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For new users, especially those not familiar with RPC frameworks, learning and understanding Thrift’s IDL and operations can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Documentation and Community Support
    Compared to some alternative technologies, Apache Thrift's documentation and community support can be less robust, which might pose challenges in troubleshooting or seeking guidance.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Thrift does not support some advanced features like streaming or multiplexing out of the box, which could limit its use in complex systems requiring these functionalities.
  • Infrastructure Overhead
    Integrating Thrift into an existing system might introduce infrastructure overhead both in initial setup and ongoing maintenance, especially when dealing with multiple languages.
  • Protocol Limitations
    While Thrift is highly efficient, its protocol limitations might require additional workarounds for certain data structures or transport mechanisms, complicating development.

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

Analysis of Apache Thrift

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Apache Thrift is considered to be a good option for projects needing cross-language communication and efficient serialization. Its efficiency and wide adoption have proven it to be a reliable framework in many production environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Thrift is a widely used framework for scalable cross-language services development. It allows for seamless communication between programs written in different languages by providing code generation and serialization capabilities for a variety of languages. Thrift supports an efficient binary protocol and is highly customizable, making it a robust choice for services that require performance and flexibility. Additionally, it's an open-source project under the Apache Software Foundation, which ensures it has a strong community and ongoing updates.

Recommended for

  • Organizations that require cross-language service communication
  • Projects that need high-performance and low-latency data transmission
  • Developers looking for a framework with support for multiple programming languages
  • Teams looking for a customizable serialization protocol

Apache Thrift videos

+ Add

Apache Thrift

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Thrift and Apache CXF)

Apache Thrift

Apache CXF

Web Servers
100 100%
Web Servers
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
Ruby Web Framework
0 0%
Ruby Web Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Thrift and Apache CXF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Thrift should be more popular than Apache CXF. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Thrift mentions (13)

  • Show HN: TypeSchema – A JSON specification to describe data models
    I once read a paper about Apache/Meta Thrift [1,2]. It allows you to define data types/interfaces in a definition file and generate code for many programming languages. It was specifically designed for RPCs and microservices. [1]: https://thrift.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Delving Deeper: Enriching Microservices with Golang with CloudWeGo
    While gRPC and Apache Thrift have served the microservice architecture well, CloudWeGo's advanced features and performance metrics set it apart as a promising open source solution for the future. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Reddit System Design/Architecture
    Services in general communicate via Thrift (and in some cases HTTP). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Universal type language!
    Protocol Buffers is the most popular one, but there are many others such as Apache Thrift and my own Typical. Source: over 3 years ago
  • You worked on it? Why is it slow then?
    RPC is not strictly OO, but you can think of RPC calls like method calls. In general it will reflect your interface design and doesn't have to be top-down, although a good project usually will look that way. A good contrast to REST where you use POST/PUT/GET/DELETE pattern on resources where as a procedure call could be a lot more flexible and potentially lighter weight. Think of it like defining methods in code... Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 3 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Thrift and Apache CXF, you can also consider the following products

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Apache ZooKeeper - Apache ZooKeeper is an effort to develop and maintain an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination.

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

Eureka - Eureka is a contact center and enterprise performance through speech analytics that immediately reveals insights from automated analysis of communications including calls, chat, email, texts, social media, surveys and more.

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

Loading...