Software Alternatives & Startups

Apache Subversion VS SCM-Manager

Compare Apache Subversion VS SCM-Manager and see what are their differences

Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Rating
0 reviews
SCM-Manager

The easiest way to share and manage your Git, Mercurial and Subversion repositories. The SCM-Manager is a tool for source code management and version control that offers all the features DevOps teams need.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Free Free trial

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, SCM-Manager seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 4
Git popularity
90% vs 10%
alternatives listed
75 vs 25

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Apache Subversion
SCM-Manager
Website github.com scm-manager.org
Pricing —
Open source Free Free trial
Platforms —
Cloudogu Ecosystem Windows Mac OSX Linux Docker Kubernetes +3
Listed in

About Apache Subversion and SCM-Manager

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Apache Subversion
SCM-Manager

No description of Apache Subversion yet.

100% open source under MIT license: The SCM-Manager is free for commercial and personal use – regardless of the size of your team. No unnessessary weight: The lean core of the SCM-Manager is fully focused on its core task: Support for your repository hosting and repository management....

Read more about SCM-Manager

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Apache Subversion 5 features
SCM-Manager 12 features
  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.
  • Repository Hosting and Management (Git, Mercurial, Subversion)
  • API
  • Third Party Integrations
  • Activity Dashboard
  • Bug Tracking
  • Continous Integration
  • Continous Delivery
  • Continous Deployment
  • Version Control
  • Automated Testing
  • Code Review
  • Issue Tracking

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Apache Subversion
SCM-Manager

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

No analysis of SCM-Manager yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Apache Subversion 1 video + Add
SCM-Manager 1 video + Add

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

SCM-Manager | Full Control Over Your Source Code Management

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Apache Subversion
SCM-Manager
90% 90%
Git
10% 10%
87% 87%
13% 13%
89% 89%
11% 11%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Subversion and SCM-Manager. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Apache Subversion 0 mentions
SCM-Manager 4 mentions

Tracking Apache Subversion since May 2021.

  • GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation
    I've always used self-hosted https://scm-manager.org for personal stuff and never felt any need to move to anything else. It is a surprisingly good and for some reason not very popular, piece of software. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • SVN Server recommendations for windows server
    You might take a look at SCM Manager - https://scm-manager.org/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • DevOps Toolchain Cloudogu EcoSystem DevStarter
    The source code management tool SCM-Manager can be used to manage Git, Mercurial as well as Subversion repositories. This makes the tool much more flexible than other solutions that only support one kind of repositories, e,g, Git. This... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Apache Subversion and SCM-Manager

When comparing Apache Subversion and SCM-Manager, you can also consider the following products.