Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Subversion VS RunsOn

Compare Apache Subversion VS RunsOn and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

RunsOn logo RunsOn

Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • RunsOn 10x cheaper GitHub Action runners
    10x cheaper GitHub Action runners //
    2024-01-23
  • RunsOn Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub
    Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub //
    2024-01-23

Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.

RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.

Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.

We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.

Apache Subversion

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

RunsOn

$ Details
freemium โ‚ฌ300 / Annually
Platforms
AWS GitHub
Release Date
2024 January

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVNโ€™s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

RunsOn features and specs

  • Ephemeral self-hosted runners
  • Autoscaling
  • Pricing
    10x cheaper than competition

Analysis of Apache Subversion

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

Apache Subversion videos

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

RunsOn videos

No RunsOn videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Subversion and RunsOn)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
87 87%
13% 13
GitHub
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Apache Subversion and RunsOn.

What makes your product unique?

RunsOn's answer:

10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

RunsOn's answer:

Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

RunsOn's answer:

CTO / Senior developers

What's the story behind your product?

RunsOn's answer:

Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Subversion and RunsOn. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RunsOn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Subversion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Subversion yet. Tracking of Apache Subversion recommendations started around May 2021.

RunsOn mentions (12)

  • GitHub Is Experiencing Difficulties
    > they really aren't cheap if you compare to hosting it yourself Our company has been using https://runs-on.com/ for larger runners and it is significantly cheaper. Equivalent On-demand AWS instances have similar per-minute pricing but AWS instances are generally faster, and moreso when using the S3 cache. The instances are more configurable than Github's runners so you can optimize for costs that way as well. If... - Source: Hacker News / 11 days ago
  • Surprise Pay $1000
    If you want a 'fixed' cost option for GitHub self hosted runners on your AWS I can't recommend https://runs-on.com/ enough. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • GitHub Actions down again today
    There are a couple and have very good reputation - though I've never used them https://www.blacksmith.sh/ They also say that they're much cheaper than github. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • GitHub Actions is the weakest link
    My team has been using https://runs-on.com/ for AWS instance runners, had a few glitches but largely been great for using AWS instances for runners. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • GitHub Actions Is Slowly Killing Your Engineering Team
    > You know how I know GitHubโ€™s runners are bad? Because thereโ€™s an entire cottage industry of companies whose sole product is โ€œGitHub Actions, but the runners donโ€™t suck.โ€ Namespace, Blacksmith, Actuated, Runs-on, BuildJet He's not wrong. Buildjet just announced they were shutting down though, citing recent improvements to the GitHub Actions platform. For the record I maintain the Runs-on [1] he's talking about,... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Subversion and RunsOn, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Forgejo - Forgejo is a self-hosted lightweight software forge. Easy to install and low maintenance, it just does the job.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket