Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.
RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.
Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.
We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.
Pricing
10x cheaper than competition
Ephemeral self-hosted runners
Autoscaling
Promote RunsOn. You can add any of these badges on your website.
10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.
Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.
CTO / Senior developers
Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if RunsOn is good.
Check the traffic stats of RunsOn on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of RunsOn on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of RunsOn's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of RunsOn on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about RunsOn on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
If you want a 'fixed' cost option for GitHub self hosted runners on your AWS I can't recommend https://runs-on.com/ enough. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
There are a couple and have very good reputation - though I've never used them https://www.blacksmith.sh/ They also say that they're much cheaper than github. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
My team has been using https://runs-on.com/ for AWS instance runners, had a few glitches but largely been great for using AWS instances for runners. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
> You know how I know GitHubโs runners are bad? Because thereโs an entire cottage industry of companies whose sole product is โGitHub Actions, but the runners donโt suck.โ Namespace, Blacksmith, Actuated, Runs-on, BuildJet He's not wrong. Buildjet just announced they were shutting down though, citing recent improvements to the GitHub Actions platform. For the record I maintain the Runs-on [1] he's talking about,... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I am developing a self-hosted solution for this [1]. Itโs true that itโs somewhat of a pain but JIT runners allow a lot of flexibility that we donโt find elsewhere. [1] https://runs-on.com. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
RunsOn is a self-hosted runner manager for GitHub Actions that you can install in your own AWS account. It will automatically spawn EC2 VMs as self-hosted runners for your GitHub Actions workflows. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
I'm working on https://runs-on.com, a self-hosted solution to get 10x cheaper GitHub Actions runners with support for Linux x64 and arm64. This month I've been refining Windows support and hopefully this gets fully shipped before Aug 31st! - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
You could also be interested in https://runs-on.com. Must be installed in your AWS account (1-click cloudformation template), and then you can use any instance type offered by AWS. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
> We were using self-hosted runners which were not as efficient as we thought so we spawned EC2 instances and connected them to the github network to be runners, but we had such an amount of issues that we wanted to go back to non-self hosted For those hitting that same kind of issue (and you are many), you should check out my product https://runs-on.com. 1-click install, 1-click upgrades, and from 7x to 16x... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
> while we can boot the Actions runner within 5 seconds of a job starting, it can take GitHub 10+ seconds to actually deliver that job to the runner This. I went the same route with regards to boot time optimisations for [1] (cleaning up the AMI, cloud-init, etc.), and can boot a VM from cold in 15s (I can't rely on prewarming pools of machines -- even stopped -- since RunsOn doesn't share machines with multiple... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Yes, I wonder when/if GitHub decides to drop prices at some point. But in the meantime Iโve recently released RunsOn [1] with the same promise (10x cheaper, faster) but the whole thing runs in your AWS account. [1] https://runs-on.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Do you know an article comparing RunsOn to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is RunsOn good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss RunsOn here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.