
Git
Mercurial SCM
Atlassian Bitbucket Server
GitKraken
GitHub Desktop
Tower
Perforce
Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Keygen
The simplest way to license your app.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Keylight.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | keylight.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Belgium · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Apache Subversion yet.
Keylight sits between your payment provider and your app. Licenses, activations, customers, and usage all live here. Switch providers, or run several, without shipping a new build.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows
No Keylight.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Apache Subversion and Keylight.dev.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight keeps app licensing separate from payments. You can use Stripe, Paddle, Lemon Squeezy, Polar, Gumroad, or your own checkout without tying your app to one provider.
It handles license keys, device activations, trials, free tiers, offline access, grace periods, and signed license state through one SDK.
Keylight.dev's answer:
My goal is to make all apps work with Keylight. So all of your licenses, from any types of apps, is going through Keylight for analytics, customer portal, support, ...
Most licensing tools are bundled into a payment provider. Keylight is built as an independent licensing layer.
That means you can change payment providers, sell through multiple platforms, or change your pricing model without rebuilding licensing inside your app.
It also gives developers a ready-made SDK and dashboard instead of requiring them to build and maintain their own licensing backend.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight is primarily built for independent developers and software companies selling apps directly to customers.
Its main audience includes:
macOS and iOS developers Web app and SaaS developers Developers selling outside app stores Teams migrating from a payment provider’s built-in licensing Developers who need trials, device limits, offline access, and license analytics
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight started because I kept rebuilding the same licensing systems for different apps: license keys, trials, activations, offline access, device changes, and all the edge cases that come with them.
I also did not want licensing to be controlled by whichever payment provider an app happened to use.
So I built Keylight as a standalone layer between the app and the payment provider. Payment platforms send events to Keylight, and the app receives one consistent license state through the SDK.
Keylight.dev's answer:
That's confidential.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Swift and Swift Package Manager for the Apple SDK Rust SDK / JS SDK / C# SDK / C++ SDK TypeScript React Next.js Stripe Connect and payment-provider webhooks Cryptographic signatures for secure, offline-capable licenses REST APIs for application and provider integrations
Share your experience with using Apache Subversion and Keylight.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Apache Subversion yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Apache Subversion since May 2021.
You don't want to hand-roll Ed25519 and lease parsing. Most licensing SDKs hide this behind a couple of calls. With Keylight, for example, the offline path collapses to: activate once, then a local checkOnLaunch() that verifies the lease... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Full disclosure: I now build Keylight, so weigh this accordingly — I'm telling you the seam it's designed for, not that it wins every row. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Full docs and the free tier are at keylight.dev. If you're on Tauri or Electron instead of native Swift, the same SDK pattern exists in JS/Rust. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
When comparing Apache Subversion and Keylight.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.
Compare Git to Apache Subversion or Keylight.dev:

A dead-simple software licensing API built for developers
Compare Keygen to Apache Subversion or Keylight.dev:

Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.
Compare Mercurial SCM to Apache Subversion or Keylight.dev:

Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.
Compare Atlassian Bitbucket Server to Apache Subversion or Keylight.dev:

The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.
Compare GitKraken to Apache Subversion or Keylight.dev:

GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
Compare GitHub Desktop to Apache Subversion or Keylight.dev: