Apache CXF VS Quasar Framework

Compare Apache CXF VS Quasar Framework and see what are their differences

ASocks

Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Quasar Framework

SPA front-end on steroids.

Landing page //
2019-12-29

Landing page //
2023-06-12

Apache CXF

Website: cxf.apache.org
$ Details

Edit details

Quasar Framework

Website: quasar.dev
$ Details: -

Edit details

Apache CXF features and specs

Comprehensive Web Service Support
Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
Flexibility
CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
Integration
It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
Active Community and Documentation
Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
Performance
Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

Complexity for Beginners
The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
Steep Learning Curve
Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
Documentation Gaps
While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

Quasar Framework features and specs

Versatile UI Components
Quasar provides a rich set of UI components that are highly customizable and can be used to build responsive and highly interactive web, mobile, and desktop applications.
Cross-Platform Development
Quasar is designed to facilitate the development of cross-platform applications, allowing developers to write a single codebase that can be deployed to web, mobile (via Cordova or Capacitor), and desktop (via Electron) environments.
Performance Optimization
Quasar comes with built-in performance optimizations such as lazy loading, code splitting, and tree shaking, ensuring that applications run efficiently on multiple platforms.
Developer-Friendly
Quasar offers a great developer experience with comprehensive documentation, active community support, and a set of powerful CLI tools for fast development and easy project management.
Integrated State Management
Quasar seamlessly integrates with Vuex for state management, making it straightforward to manage application state in a scalable and maintainable way.

Possible disadvantages of Quasar Framework

Steep Learning Curve
New developers or those unfamiliar with Vue.js may find Quasar's extensive toolkit and unique features overwhelming, leading to a steeper learning curve compared to more straightforward frameworks.
Large Bundle Size
Despite its performance optimizations, the comprehensive nature of Quasar can sometimes result in larger bundle sizes, which may impact load times, especially for applications with extensive functionality.
Dependency on Vue.js
Quasar is heavily tied to the Vue.js ecosystem. This means that developers must be proficient in Vue.js to fully leverage Quasar's capabilities, potentially limiting its adoption by teams preferring other JavaScript frameworks.
Mobile Performance
While Quasar supports mobile development, performance can vary depending on the specifics of the project and target platform, potentially requiring additional optimization for a seamless user experience.
Community and Ecosystem
Quasar's community and ecosystem, while growing, are still not as large or mature as those of other more established frameworks like React or Angular, which may result in fewer third-party plugins and shared resources.

Analysis of Quasar Framework

Overall verdict

Quasar Framework is a highly recommended option for developers seeking to build high-quality applications across different platforms efficiently using Vue.js.

Why this product is good

Quasar Framework is considered good because it allows developers to build high-performance, responsive applications with ease. It uses Vue.js for its component-based structure, enabling efficient and manageable application development. Quasar also supports multiple platforms, offering the ability to create web, mobile, and desktop applications from a single codebase. It comes with a set of pre-built UI components and robust documentation, making development faster and more streamlined. Additionally, Quasar has a vibrant community and regular updates, ensuring continued support and improvements.

Recommended for

Developers familiar with or interested in using Vue.js
Teams looking to build cross-platform applications from a single codebase
Projects requiring a robust and pre-designed UI component library
Developers who prefer comprehensive documentation and active community support
Companies aiming for rapid development cycles with consistent performance across platforms

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Quasar Framework videos

+ Add

Quasar Framework for Vue.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache CXF and Quasar Framework)

Quasar Framework

Developer Tools

18 18%

Developer Tools

82% 82

Ruby Web Framework

100 100%

Ruby Web Framework

0% 0

Development Tools

0 0%

Development Tools

100% 100

Web Frameworks

100 100%

Web Frameworks

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache CXF and Quasar Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache CXF and Quasar Framework

Apache CXF Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache CXF yet.
Be the first one to post

Quasar Framework Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try

If you are a freelancer or working with an agency, Quasar will help you build innovative websites to satisfy your clients. This alternative to Next.js can handle the complete development experience with its efficient-focused framework. In addition, users can explore its top navigation bar to search functions and discover the most critical technical resources.

Source: www.zegocloud.com

20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering

Whisk your projects to any platform with Quasar. It’s a cross-platform darling built on Vue.js that’s keen on delivering your vision from a single codebase. Talk desktop, mobile, spa, SSR, you name it – Quasar has its tickets ready.

Source: tms-outsource.com

10 Best Next.js Alternatives to Consider Today

Quasar, a Vue.js framework, empowers developers to build responsive and performant applications for various platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop. With a component-first architecture and support for single-page applications (SPA) and server-side rendering (SSR), Quasar provides a versatile solution for building cross-platform applications. Its extensive component...

Source: www.saffrontech.net

15 of the Most Interesting Vue UI Component Libraries for 2023

We have listed 15 Vue UI component libraries here that perform various functions, but which is best? Well, the answer, as usual, is “it depends.” If you want a complete solution, you may want to go ahead and pick Quasar. On the other hand, if you are looking for a plug-and-play solution for your existing projects, you may want to go ahead with Vuetify or Keen-UI.

Source: www.codeinwp.com

The Best Vue 3 UI Libraries

With more than 81 components, Quasar is a framework with a lot of punch. Quasar should be used if you intend to use Vue.js to create a highly reliable and responsive online and mobile application.

Source: upmostly.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Quasar Framework should be more popular than Apache CXF. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 2 years ago
What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Quasar Framework mentions (9)

Exploring the Vue.js Ecosystem: Tools and Libraries That Make Development Fun
Imagine writing your app once and having it work on web, mobile, and even desktop. That's Quasar for you. It's not just about UI; it's about creating a universal app. With its Material Design components, Quasar lets you customize your app's look while ensuring it performs beautifully across devices. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
PocketBase + React Native
I have a bit of an obsession with finding the fastest way to launch apps. My goal is to be able to create fully functional MVP's and proofs of concept in less than a day. That means being able to spin up a backend and then implement a frontend as efficiently as possible. For the backend, PocketBase has been my favorite lately. On the frontend I am still trying to find a winner. I like Quasar (VueJS + Capacitor)... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Ask HN: What are you working on? (April 2025)
Cool, could also check out a unified App platform framework: https://quasar.dev/ Cheers =3. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Torvalds: You can avoid Rust as a C maintainer, but you can't interfere with it
In general... It is often a skill issue with labor pools, as firms accepted Java/JavaScript is almost universally known by juniors. Apps are in user space, and are often disposable-code after 18 months in most cases. Projects like https://quasar.dev/ offer iPhone/Android/iOS/MacOS/Win11 single code base auto-generated App publishing options, but most people never hear of it given a MacOS build host is required for... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
What do you think about using a game engine for UI?
In general, people must make a choice between portability, and the breadth of optimizations. For multi-platform builds, there are single code-base frameworks available: https://quasar.dev/ For MacOS, Linux Gtk, and Windows native builds there are mature free libraries that allow both FOSS and commercial static linking: https://wxwidgets.org/ Game engines are designed to solve a single set of use-cases for... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago