Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache CXF VS Material Design for Bootstrap

Compare Apache CXF VS Material Design for Bootstrap and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index

Material Design for Bootstrap logo Material Design for Bootstrap

Material Design for Bootstrap is a Bootstrap compatible theme for use in Bootstrap based application.
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29
  • Material Design for Bootstrap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-25

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

Material Design for Bootstrap features and specs

  • Aesthetic Appeal
    Material Design for Bootstrap provides a modern and visually appealing look by integrating Google's Material Design philosophy with Bootstrap components, which can enhance the user experience and make applications more attractive.
  • Familiarity
    Developers familiar with Bootstrap will find it easy to adopt Material Design for Bootstrap due to its inherent Bootstrap architecture, easing the learning curve while adding Material Design elements.
  • Responsive Design
    Material Design for Bootstrap maintains Bootstrap's robust responsive grid system, enabling designers to create mobile-friendly and adaptable web pages with Material Design aesthetics.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The framework offers extensive documentation, examples, and community support, which simplifies the development process and allows for easier troubleshooting and customization.
  • Customization
    It allows for significant customization where developers can override component styles, mix colors, and use variables to align with brand requirements while maintaining Material Design standards.

Possible disadvantages of Material Design for Bootstrap

  • Performance Overhead
    Integrating Material Design with Bootstrap can lead to additional CSS and JavaScript overhead, potentially impacting the performance of the website if not optimized.
  • Complexity
    Combining two design systems can introduce complexity, as developers may need to navigate through both Material Design principles and Bootstrap's framework, which could increase development time.
  • Inconsistencies
    There might be inconsistencies or conflicts between Material Design components and Bootstrap components, particularly when attempting customizations or using third-party plugins not designed for Material Design.
  • Dependency on Bootstrap
    For projects that do not require all the functionalities of Bootstrap, using Material Design for Bootstrap might introduce unnecessary dependencies, resulting in a heavier and bloated front-end.
  • Limited Advanced Components
    While it covers most basic components, developers looking for advanced and highly specialized elements may find Material Design for Bootstrap lacking compared to more dedicated Material Design libraries.

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Material Design for Bootstrap videos

+ Add

VueBootstrap vs Material Design For Bootstrap (WHICH ONE SHOULD I CHOOSE?)

More videos:

  • Review - Material Design for Bootstrap PRO - 5 min Quick Start

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache CXF and Material Design for Bootstrap)

Apache CXF

Material Design for Bootstrap

Developer Tools
45 45%
Developer Tools
55% 55
Ruby Web Framework
57 57%
Ruby Web Framework
43% 43
Web Frameworks
47 47%
Web Frameworks
53% 53
Vector Icons
100 100%
Vector Icons
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache CXF and Material Design for Bootstrap. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache CXF seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Material Design for Bootstrap mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Material Design for Bootstrap yet. Tracking of Material Design for Bootstrap recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache CXF and Material Design for Bootstrap, you can also consider the following products

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

PhotoSwipe - JavaScript gallery, no dependencies.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Sinatra - Classy web-development dressed in a DSL

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

Loading...