Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache CXF VS Flask

Compare Apache CXF VS Flask and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index

Flask logo Flask

a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions.
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29
  • Flask Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

Flask features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Flask is a micro-framework, meaning it is lightweight, easy to understand, and simple to use. It requires minimal setup to get a web application up and running.
  • Flexibility
    Flask provides flexibility and control over the application's architecture, allowing developers to choose the components they need and avoid unnecessary bloat.
  • Extensibility
    Flask supports various extensions to add capabilities like database integration, form validation, and authentication without compromising its core simplicity.
  • Documentation
    Flask has comprehensive and well-organized documentation, making it easier for developers to learn and implement features effectively.
  • Community
    Flask has a large and active community, providing ample resources like tutorials, code snippets, and third-party libraries that can help speed up development.
  • Testing
    Flask is designed to be unit tested easily, allowing developers to test their applications and ensure reliability.

Possible disadvantages of Flask

  • Scalability
    Flask may not be as scalable as some other frameworks for very large applications due to its minimalist design and lack of built-in features.
  • Boilerplate Code
    Since Flask requires you to integrate and configure many components manually, codebases in Flask can sometimes contain a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Opinionated Architecture
    While Flask provides flexibility, it also means there are fewer conventions. Developers must make more architectural decisions, which can be challenging for large team collaboration.
  • Limited Tools
    Compared to more comprehensive frameworks, Flask offers fewer built-in tools and features, which may necessitate additional plugins or custom implementations.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Applications
    While Flask is easy to learn for simple applications, it can become complex to manage as the application grows, requiring a good understanding of design patterns and software architecture.

Analysis of Flask

Overall verdict

  • Flask is a good choice for developers looking for a lightweight and flexible framework for building web applications, particularly if they value simplicity and control over out-of-the-box features.

Why this product is good

  • Flask is a microframework for Python, offering simplicity and flexibility, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications.
  • It has a simple core with easy-to-add extensions, allowing developers to customize their applications as needed.
  • Flask's lightweight nature means it has a small overhead, leading to faster development cycles and easier debugging.
  • It has a strong community and excellent documentation, providing ample resources for learning and troubleshooting.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer Python and want a minimalist approach to web development.
  • Those working on small to medium-sized applications or microservices.
  • Developers who appreciate a modular and extensible architecture.
  • Teams that require rapid prototyping or quick deployment cycles.

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Flask videos

+ Add

Built To Last A Life Time - Ragproper Modern Glass Flask Review

More videos:

  • Review - The Hip Flask Guide - Gentleman's Gazette
  • Review - 10 Best Flasks 2019

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache CXF and Flask)

Apache CXF

Flask

Developer Tools
6 6%
Developer Tools
94% 94
Ruby Web Framework
100 100%
Ruby Web Framework
0% 0
Web Frameworks
7 7%
Web Frameworks
93% 93
Python Web Framework
0 0%
Python Web Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache CXF and Flask. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache CXF and Flask

Apache CXF Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache CXF yet.
Be the first one to post

Flask Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Flask is the micro that’s got your back without trying to run the show. It comes with the essentials but trusts you to pick your tools — no baggage attached, truly Pythonic at heart.
Source: tms-outsource.com
Top 9 best Frameworks for web development
The best frameworks for web development include React, Angular, Vue.js, Django, Spring, Laravel, Ruby on Rails, Flask and Express.js. Each of these frameworks has its own advantages and distinctive features, so it is important to choose the framework that best suits the needs of your project.
Source: www.kiwop.com
25 Python Frameworks to Master
You’ll also have access to some extension packages like Flask-RESTful, which adds support for building powerful REST APIs, and Flask-SQLAlchemy, a convenient way to use SQLAlchemy in your flask app.
Source: kinsta.com
3 Web Frameworks to Use With Python
Flask is a micro web framework for building web applications with Python. Here is the official web page of Flask.
Source: www.stratascratch.com
Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives
Flask is a micro-framework, i.e., it does not bundle tools and libraries and instead uses third party libraries to deliver functionalities.
Source: blog.back4app.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flask seems to be a lot more popular than Apache CXF. While we know about 42 links to Flask, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Apache CXF. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Flask mentions (42)

  • PSET 9 Finance - What is "disable response caching" and the function they ask to notice
    "After configuring Flask, notice how this file disables caching of responses (provided you’re in debugging mode, which you are by default in your code50 codespace), lest you make a change to some file but your browser not notice. ". Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to Send an Email in Python
    Flask, which offers a simple interface for email sending— Flask Mail. (Check here how to send emails with Flask). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Plotting Bookmarks with Flask, Matplotlib, and OAuth 2.0
    Lang="en"> Plot Bookmarks!{% block title %}{% endblock %} rel="stylesheet" href="https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.2.1/css/bootstrap.min.css" /> class="container"> Plot Bookmarks by Date {% block containercontent %}{% endblock %} /> class="footer"> class="text-muted"> >This is a... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Determining what version of Flask is installed
    What's the easiest way to determine which version of Flask is installed? Source: about 3 years ago
  • What is the point of uWSGI?
    I'm looking at the WSGI specification and I'm trying to figure out how servers like uWSGI fit into the picture. I understand the point of the WSGI spec is to separate web servers like nginx from web applications like something you'd write using Flask. What I don't understand is what uWSGI is for. Why can't nginx directly call my Flask application? Can't flask speak WSGI directly to it? Why does uWSGI need to get... Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache CXF and Flask, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Loading...