Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache CXF VS Fancybox

Compare Apache CXF VS Fancybox and see what are their differences

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index

Fancybox logo Fancybox

fancyapps.com - Fancy App Store
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29
  • Fancybox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

Fancybox features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Fancybox offers a clean and intuitive interface that is easy for developers to integrate and for users to navigate, making it a popular choice for displaying images, videos, and other media content.
  • Responsive Design
    It is designed to be responsive, working seamlessly on various devices and screen sizes, which is essential for modern web applications.
  • Customizability
    Fancybox provides a range of customization options that allow developers to tailor its appearance and functionality to fit the specific needs of their projects.
  • Wide Range of Media Support
    The library supports a variety of media types such as images, videos, iframes, and HTML content, offering flexibility for different use cases.
  • Active Community and Support
    There is an active community and available documentation that provide support and resources for troubleshooting and enhancing the use of Fancybox.

Possible disadvantages of Fancybox

  • Potential Performance Issues
    Including Fancybox in a project might lead to increased load times, as it requires additional JavaScript and CSS files, which could affect site performance.
  • Limited Free Features
    The free version of Fancybox has limited features, which may not be sufficient for all users, pushing them towards the paid version for advanced functionalities.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    While Fancybox is customizable, achieving complex customizations may require a deeper understanding of both the library and JavaScript, posing a challenge for beginners.
  • Browser Compatibility Issues
    Occasionally, developers might encounter compatibility issues with certain browsers, necessitating additional testing and debugging.

Apache CXF videos

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Fancybox videos

No Fancybox videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache CXF and Fancybox)
Developer Tools
37 37%
63% 63
Ruby Web Framework
44 44%
56% 56
Web Frameworks
42 42%
58% 58
Vector Icons
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache CXF and Fancybox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Fancybox might be a bit more popular than Apache CXF. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to Apache CXF. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Whatโ€™s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Fancybox mentions (2)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache CXF and Fancybox, you can also consider the following products

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

PhotoSwipe - JavaScript gallery, no dependencies.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Sinatra - Classy web-development dressed in a DSL

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!