Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Apache CXF VS eSignLive

Compare Apache CXF VS eSignLive and see what are their differences

CloudCLI
Shared cloud environments for AI coding agents. Run Claude Code, Cursor CLI, Codex, and Gemini CLI from any device, API, or automation tool. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index

eSignLive logo eSignLive

E-SignLive that is also called as e-SignLive by Silanis that will make you able to enjoy the e-signature and electronic signature from any part of the word.
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29
  • eSignLive Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

eSignLive features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    eSignLive offers a simple and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and utilize the platform efficiently, minimizing the learning curve.
  • High Security Standards
    Provides robust security features, including encryption and multi-factor authentication, to ensure document integrity and protect sensitive information.
  • Wide Integration Capabilities
    Supports integration with various existing business applications and workflows, such as CRM and ERP systems, enhancing productivity and convenience.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    Compliant with various international standards such as eIDAS, UETA, and ESIGN, making it suitable for businesses operating in different regulatory environments.
  • Flexible Deployment Options
    Offers both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options to meet different organizational needs and preferences.

Possible disadvantages of eSignLive

  • Cost
    The cost of using eSignLive can be high, particularly for small businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Limited Mobile App Features
    The mobile app version may not offer all the features available in the desktop version, which can limit usability on mobile devices.
  • Complex Integration
    Integrating eSignLive with some existing software systems might require additional time and technical expertise, which could be challenging for smaller IT teams.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic functions are user-friendly, some advanced features may have a steep learning curve for users who are not tech-savvy.

Analysis of eSignLive

Overall verdict

  • Yes, eSignLive is a reliable and secure choice for businesses seeking an efficient electronic signature solution. It balances functionality and security, making it a valuable tool in the digital transformation of document workflows.

Why this product is good

  • eSignLive is considered a good digital signature solution due to its robust security features, compliance with e-signature laws and regulations, user-friendly interface, and integration capabilities with various business applications. Furthermore, it offers comprehensive audit trails, ensuring transparency and integrity in the signing process.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses seeking secure document signing solutions
  • Enterprises that require compliance with strict security and legal standards
  • Organizations looking to streamline their document processes and workflows
  • Users who need integration with existing business software and CRM systems
  • Companies prioritizing a user-friendly solution for all levels of technological proficiency

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

eSignLive videos

+ Add

eSignLive: How to Use Fast Track

More videos:

  • Review - How eSignLive E-Signatures Work
  • Tutorial - eSignLive: How to Sign Transactions from the Dashboard

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache CXF and eSignLive)

Apache CXF

eSignLive

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
eSignature
0 0%
eSignature
100% 100
Ruby Web Framework
100 100%
Ruby Web Framework
0% 0
Document Automation
0 0%
Document Automation
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache CXF and eSignLive. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, eSignLive should be more popular than Apache CXF. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 3 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

eSignLive mentions (3)

  • New CS email with info on purchase process.
    The email to get excited about (the one for the PBA) comes from esignlive.com. When you get that, you're close to having a truck. After you sign the PBA, the one to begin the 8-step purchase process will come from rivian.com; when you get that one, you're *really* close to having a truck :^). Source: over 4 years ago
  • Buying Experience
    Esignlive.com doesn't play with the Safari browser (looks to be something with the code doing the redirect, but I'm not a webdev so IDK for sure). Source: over 4 years ago
  • Weekly Rivian Roundup [5/2/2022]
    Finally got the email with my PBA link! Was surprised to see a message from "Rivian" in my Inbox when I have a rule sending *everything* from rivian.com to a folder I keep right up top for easy monitoring. Turns out it was from the digital signature company, esignlive.com. Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache CXF and eSignLive, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

DocuSign - Try DocuSign's interactive signing demo now! Send yourself an electronic document to digitally sign using our e-signature service.

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

Dropbox Sign - eSignatures Simplified. The Most Powerful Platform for Your Business Agreements.

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

PandaDoc - Boost your revenue with PandaDoc. A document automation tool that delivers higher close rates and shorter sales cycles. We've helped over 30,000+ companies.

Loading...