Software Alternatives & Startups

AngularUI VS Material Design for Angular

Compare AngularUI VS Material Design for Angular and see what are their differences

AngularUI

Native AngularJS directives for Bootstrap.

Rating
0 reviews
Material Design for Angular

Material Design for AngularJS Apps

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Material Design for Angular might be a bit more popular than AngularUI. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to AngularUI.

social mentions
1 vs 1
Development Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
144 vs 32

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

AngularUI
Material Design for Angular
Website angular-ui.github.io github.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

AngularUI 4 features
Material Design for Angular 5 features
  • Rich Component Library
    AngularUI provides a dense library of user interface components, including modals, custom select boxes, and sliders, reducing the amount of code you need to write and speeding up development.
  • Native to AngularJS
    Designed to work seamlessly with AngularJS, AngularUI widgets and directives integrate naturally with AngularJS, offering a more consistent and performant solution compared to external libraries.
  • Extensive Documentation
    AngularUI has comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to understand how to integrate and utilize components, which reduces the learning curve.
  • Active Community
    There is an active and supportive community surrounding AngularUI, ensuring that developers can find help and resources quickly.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on AngularJS
    AngularUI is built for AngularJS, and it is not compatible with Angular (the newer version of AngularJS). This limits its usability for new projects that prefer to use the more recent frameworks.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, the additional features and abstractions provided by AngularUI can introduce performance overhead, particularly in large or complex applications.
  • Stagnation Risk
    As AngularJS is an older framework, there's a risk that AngularUI will not receive as much support or updates in the future, leading to potential issues with maintainability and compatibility.
  • Limited Integration
    AngularUI may have limitations when integrating with other tools or libraries that are not within its ecosystem, which could lead to additional effort in making these work together.
  • Consistent Design Language
    Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive set of design guidelines and components that ensure a consistent look and feel across applications. This can enhance user experience by providing familiar UI components.
  • Comprehensive Component Library
    It offers a wide range of pre-built UI components which are easily customizable and help in speeding up the development process by allowing developers to use ready-made solutions instead of building components from scratch.
  • Responsive Design
    Material Design ensures that applications are responsive, which is crucial for providing a seamless user experience across different devices and screen sizes.
  • Integration with Angular
    Being developed specifically for Angular, it integrates smoothly with Angular applications, leveraging features like Angular's dependency injection and change detection for efficient performance.
  • Active Community and Support
    The project has an active community backed by Google, which means consistent updates, bug fixes, and a wealth of resources available for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Developers may face a learning curve if they are not familiar with Angular or the Material Design guidelines, which can slow down the initial development process.
  • Bundle Size
    Including all Material Design components can lead to a larger bundle size, which might affect the performance of the application, especially on mobile devices.
  • Opinionated Design Decisions
    Material Design imposes specific design principles which might not be suitable for all applications. Developers seeking highly customized UI components might find it restrictive.
  • Dependency on Angular
    This library is specifically for Angular, so it limits reusability across projects not using Angular. This creates a dependency that can be a disadvantage if you plan to switch frameworks.
  • Complexity in Customization
    While Material Design components are feature-rich, customizing them for unique application needs can sometimes be complex and require deep knowledge of both Angular and the Material Design framework.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

AngularUI
Material Design for Angular

Overall verdict

  • AngularUI is generally considered a good choice for developers working with AngularJS due to its robust component set and strong community support. However, it's essential to note that AngularJS and its associated libraries, including AngularUI, have been succeeded by more modern frameworks such as Angular (Angular 2+) and React. For new projects, evaluating whether AngularJS or its libraries are the right choice, given their outdated status, is crucial.

Why this product is good

  • AngularUI, now part of the Angular ecosystem, provides a set of UI components that are highly modular and work well with AngularJS applications. It simplifies the development process by offering ready-to-use UI components like UI-Router and UI-Bootstrap, allowing developers to focus more on the application logic rather than the UI boilerplate. Its collaborative nature leverages the contributions from a large community, which ensures that it continuously evolves and adapts to modern development standards.

Recommended for

    AngularUI is recommended for developers maintaining legacy AngularJS applications that require enhancements and UI component implementations without adopting a completely new framework. It's also suitable for smaller projects where AngularJS is still preferred due to an organization's existing knowledge base. However, for new projects, one might consider more contemporary frameworks unless specific constraints necessitate using AngularJS.

No analysis of Material Design for Angular yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

AngularUI 2 videos + Add
Material Design for Angular 0 videos + Add

Introduction to AngularUI and UI Bootstrap

More videos

  • - Introduction to AngularUI and UI Bootstrap

No Material Design for Angular videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
AngularUI
Material Design for Angular
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using AngularUI and Material Design for Angular. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

AngularUI 1 mention
Material Design for Angular 1 mention
  • AngularJS directive with default options
    I've had a look around for the way others have done this, and in the angular-ui library the ui.bootstrap.pagination seems to do something similar. Source: over 4 years ago
  • AngularJS is dead.
    We’ll provide read-only access to the code, issue, and pull request history on GitHub by archiving the angular.js repo and related repositories (that is, AngularJS Material, bower-material, etc.). - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to AngularUI and Material Design for Angular

When comparing AngularUI and Material Design for Angular, you can also consider the following products.