Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Material UI VS AngularUI

Compare Material UI VS AngularUI and see what are their differences

Material UI

A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source Free
Alternatives Is it good?
AngularUI

Native AngularJS directives for Bootstrap.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Measure.sh
Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Material UI seems to be a lot more popular than AngularUI. While we know about 76 links to Material UI, we've tracked only 1 mention of AngularUI.

social mentions
76 vs 1
Design Tools popularity
97% vs 3%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 144

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Material UI
AngularUI
Website material-ui.com angular-ui.github.io
Pricing
Open source Free
—
Listed in
Design Tools Developer Tools CSS Framework Development Tools +1
Development Tools Javascript UI Libraries JavaScript Framework UI +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Material UI 6 features
AngularUI 4 features
  • Comprehensive Component Library
    Material UI offers a wide range of pre-built components that adhere to Google's Material Design guidelines, making it easier to build aesthetically pleasing user interfaces quickly.
  • Customizability
    Material UI components are highly customizable. Developers can easily adjust styles, themes, and behaviors to match specific project requirements.
  • Active Community and Support
    Material UI has a large and active community of developers. This means better support, frequent updates, and a wealth of resources like tutorials and documentation.
  • Improved Productivity
    The pre-built components and templates can greatly reduce the time and effort required to develop UI elements, thereby increasing development productivity.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Designed to work across multiple browsers, Material UI ensures a consistent user experience regardless of the platform.
  • Accessibility
    Material UI includes features that improve accessibility, conforming to WCAG guidelines to create more inclusive web applications.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Overhead
    The inclusion of numerous pre-built components and styles can introduce performance overhead, especially in larger applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, new developers or those not familiar with Material Design may find it challenging to learn and implement Material UI effectively.
  • Dependency on Material Design
    Material UI strictly adheres to Material Design principles, which may not be suitable for all projects or could limit creative freedom for some designers.
  • Bundle Size
    Incorporating Material UI into a project can significantly increase the bundle size, affecting the overall load time of the web application.
  • Customization Complexity
    While highly customizable, the process of overriding default styles and components can sometimes be complex and cumbersome, requiring an in-depth understanding of both Material UI and CSS-in-JS.
  • Dependency on React
    Material UI is tightly integrated with React, meaning it can't be easily used in non-React projects, limiting its applicability.
  • Rich Component Library
    AngularUI provides a dense library of user interface components, including modals, custom select boxes, and sliders, reducing the amount of code you need to write and speeding up development.
  • Native to AngularJS
    Designed to work seamlessly with AngularJS, AngularUI widgets and directives integrate naturally with AngularJS, offering a more consistent and performant solution compared to external libraries.
  • Extensive Documentation
    AngularUI has comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to understand how to integrate and utilize components, which reduces the learning curve.
  • Active Community
    There is an active and supportive community surrounding AngularUI, ensuring that developers can find help and resources quickly.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on AngularJS
    AngularUI is built for AngularJS, and it is not compatible with Angular (the newer version of AngularJS). This limits its usability for new projects that prefer to use the more recent frameworks.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, the additional features and abstractions provided by AngularUI can introduce performance overhead, particularly in large or complex applications.
  • Stagnation Risk
    As AngularJS is an older framework, there's a risk that AngularUI will not receive as much support or updates in the future, leading to potential issues with maintainability and compatibility.
  • Limited Integration
    AngularUI may have limitations when integrating with other tools or libraries that are not within its ecosystem, which could lead to additional effort in making these work together.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Material UI
AngularUI

Overall verdict

  • Material UI is considered a strong choice for developers who want to create applications with a modern and clean look, leveraging Google's Material Design principles. Its rich set of components and strong community support make it a reliable option for both small and large projects.

Why this product is good

  • Material UI (MUI) is a widely-used React component library that implements Google's Material Design guidelines, providing a consistent and modern aesthetic for web applications.
  • It offers a comprehensive set of customizable components, making it easier for developers to build responsive and visually appealing UIs.
  • MUI is well-documented and has a large community, which means plenty of third-party resources, tutorials, and support are available.
  • The library is continuously updated and maintained, ensuring compatibility with the latest versions of React and web standards.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a ready-to-use set of components adhering to Material Design, without sacrificing flexibility.
  • Projects requiring a quick development turnaround where a polished and professional UI is needed.
  • Teams that prefer not to spend extensive time on UI design and implementation while still achieving a high-quality look.

Overall verdict

  • AngularUI is generally considered a good choice for developers working with AngularJS due to its robust component set and strong community support. However, it's essential to note that AngularJS and its associated libraries, including AngularUI, have been succeeded by more modern frameworks such as Angular (Angular 2+) and React. For new projects, evaluating whether AngularJS or its libraries are the right choice, given their outdated status, is crucial.

Why this product is good

  • AngularUI, now part of the Angular ecosystem, provides a set of UI components that are highly modular and work well with AngularJS applications. It simplifies the development process by offering ready-to-use UI components like UI-Router and UI-Bootstrap, allowing developers to focus more on the application logic rather than the UI boilerplate. Its collaborative nature leverages the contributions from a large community, which ensures that it continuously evolves and adapts to modern development standards.

Recommended for

    AngularUI is recommended for developers maintaining legacy AngularJS applications that require enhancements and UI component implementations without adopting a completely new framework. It's also suitable for smaller projects where AngularJS is still preferred due to an organization's existing knowledge base. However, for new projects, one might consider more contemporary frameworks unless specific constraints necessitate using AngularJS.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Material UI 2 videos + Add
AngularUI 2 videos + Add

Getting Started With Material-UI For React (Material Design for React)

More videos

  • - Code Review: react-material-ui-datatable

Introduction to AngularUI and UI Bootstrap

More videos

  • - Introduction to AngularUI and UI Bootstrap

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Material UI
AngularUI
97% 97%
Design Tools
3% 3%
70% 70%
Development Tools
30% 30%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Material UI and AngularUI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Material UI 5.0 · 1 review
AngularUI no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of AngularUI yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Material UI 76 mentions
AngularUI 1 mention
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Material-UI - React components for faster and easier web development. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Building Forms with zod and react-hook-form
    Material UI: Component library to style our form input fields. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Getting started with NextUI and Next.js
    These UI components and elements usually include Button, Navbar, Tooltip, Tab components, and more. Many UI libraries exist, including React Bootstrap, built on the popular Bootstrap CSS library, and Material-UI, one of the most popular... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

View more

  • AngularJS directive with default options
    I've had a look around for the way others have done this, and in the angular-ui library the ui.bootstrap.pagination seems to do something similar. Source: over 4 years ago

Alternatives to Material UI and AngularUI

When comparing Material UI and AngularUI, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...