Airbnb Reviews

Cppcheck Reviews

Airbnb mentions (91)

• Converting from a Developer to a Product Founder in 10 years

  Mars seemed like an awesome platform for me, but it's just a tool, the same as many others. If I want to build a ToDo list on Mars I need somebody to develop such a micro-app for me. Then I did a simple approximation on bigger products: an e-commerce store like Amazon, service marketplaces like Booksy or Renting platform like Airbnb. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

• SPA Camping Question

  Hey everyone, I'm attending to SPA in July 28-30 this year. And I'm looking for a campsite, most of them are already booked by now. So I've found https://spafamilycamping.com/ I'm wondering if this website and place is legit. They are not on booking.com or airbnb.com and they charge 50€ per night. Source: about 1 year ago

• Visiting Romania for Rockstadt Extreme festival in August 2023

  Any tips on finding a place to stay, considering everything on booking.com and airbnb.com is either all taken or quite far away. Is there maybe a local website or a motel that isn't on those websites? Source: about 1 year ago

• Airbnb will now tell you about any annoying checkout chores a host requires before you book — and take off listings that get low reviews for chore lists

  I'm in the US and just popped over to airbnb.com to check -- there's a very prominent toggle that says "Display total price: includes all fees, before taxes". Source: about 1 year ago

• Paris reasonable stays

  If you want, you can try using the chrome extension I am developing (its completely free). What it does is it while you are searching through booking.com or airbnb.com it looks for the direct link of the same place. Source: about 1 year ago

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 1 year ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago