Adonis JS VS Ember-cli

• Modern Eco-System
  AdonisJS uses the latest JavaScript (ES6/ES7) features, providing an up-to-date and efficient development environment. This includes async/await for handling asynchronous code, making it easier to write and understand.
• ORM Support
  The framework includes a built-in ORM called Lucid, which simplifies database interactions by allowing developers to work with database records through straightforward JavaScript models.
• MVC Architecture
  AdonisJS follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which helps organize code in a clean and maintainable manner, making it easier to manage large applications.
• Built-In Authentication and Authorization
  AdonisJS comes with out-of-the-box solutions for user authentication and authorization, reducing the time required to set up these critical features in applications.
• Thorough Documentation
  AdonisJS provides comprehensive and well-maintained documentation, which makes it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to their problems quickly.
• Rich CLI
  The Command Line Interface (CLI) for AdonisJS is rich with features, facilitating a range of tasks from project scaffolding to running migrations, thus speeding up the development process.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  Although the framework is well-documented, its rich set of features and unique conventions can present a steep learning curve for beginners or those new to JavaScript frameworks.
• Limited Ecosystem
  Compared to more established frameworks like Express.js or Laravel, AdonisJS has a smaller ecosystem of third-party packages and community resources.
• Performance Overhead
  Due to its comprehensive feature set, AdonisJS can have more performance overhead compared to microframeworks that offer more control and fewer built-in features.
• Smaller Community
  While growing, the community around AdonisJS is still smaller than that of other established frameworks. This can sometimes make it more challenging to find community-driven support and solutions.
• Rapid Changes
  As a relatively new framework, AdonisJS undergoes frequent updates and changes. Keeping up with these changes can demand additional effort from developers.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Tutoriel NodeJS : Découverte d'Adonis

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• I Built a SaaS with AdonisJS 7, and I Loved It

  If you've never seen Adonis in the wild, or you've only ever reached for Next.js / Nuxt / a decoupled SPA, this article is the gentle tour I wish I'd had. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• You're Doing Rails Wrong

  Batteries included backend frameworks exists in the JS ecosystem, just look at https://adonisjs.com/ . The problem is that the nodejs ecosystem started off with micro-frameworks as the antithesis to what they believed were “overbearing”... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• The One-Person Framework in Practice

  I'm currently building out an app using AdonisJS. Its billed as a Rails like experience but in node. https://adonisjs.com/ I did a comparison between Rails, Adonis and Fiber (a Go "framework") before settling on Adonis (mostly due to... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago