Sails.js VS Ember-cli

• MVC Architecture
  Sails.js follows a Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern, making it easier to organize and maintain code, particularly for larger applications.
• Auto-Generated REST APIs
  Automatically generates RESTful APIs based on your models, saving development time and reducing boilerplate code.
• WebSocket Support
  Built-in support for WebSockets allows for real-time features without needing additional configurations.
• ORM Integration
  Waterline, Sails.js' built-in ORM, provides a straightforward way to interact with databases, supporting multiple database systems with the same codebase.
• Modularity
  Encourages modular development by supporting hooks and middleware, which can be reused or extended for various functionalities.
• Blueprints
  Blueprints provide automatic actions for basic CRUD operations, streamlining common tasks and making development faster.
• Scalability
  Designed to be scalable, allowing you to build applications that can handle a large number of simultaneous connections.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  Although Sails.js simplifies many aspects of development, there is still a learning curve, especially for those not familiar with Node.js.
• Performance Overhead
  The abstractions provided by Sails.js and its ORM can introduce performance overhead, potentially making it slower than more lightweight frameworks.
• Limited Flexibility
  While the conventions in Sails.js can speed up development, they can also limit flexibility, making it harder to implement customized or unconventional features.
• Community and Support
  The community and support for Sails.js are not as extensive as some other frameworks like Express.js, which might make troubleshooting and finding solutions more challenging.
• Outdated Documentation
  Some parts of the documentation may be outdated, which can lead to confusion and require additional time to find updated resources or examples.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Intro to Sails.js Framework for Next-Level Nodejs Backend Apps

More videos

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Top 14 Node.JS Frameworks: Which Will Rule in 2020?
  www.mindinventory.com · Dec 2019

  This is another real-time MVC web development Node.js framework created on Express. It builds the latest, data-driven style of APIs and web apps. Sails.js can develop an API bookstore.

We have no reviews of Ember-cli yet. Be the first one to post

• Indefinite Backpack Travel

  He's building js apps with https://sailsjs.com ? - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• AdonisJS

  I haven't used either so I can't chime in on that front, but long ago I was pretty into Sails which is written by a team that loves rails, but switched to NodeJS so it's basically Node on Rails. I actually thought they discontinued it,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Choosing the best JavaScript framework for your next project

  Sails is a realtime JavaScript framework built on top of Express. Sails offers built-in realtime communication support and a flexible routing system. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago