AdGuard for Android VS cppq

• Ad Blocker
  AdGuard for Android effectively blocks ads across all apps and browsers, leading to a cleaner browsing experience and potentially saving on data usage.
• Privacy Protection
  The app blocks trackers and analytics systems, helping to protect user privacy by preventing data collection by third parties.
• Customizable
  AdGuard offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to tailor the app’s behavior to their specific needs and preferences, including whitelist management and custom filter lists.
• Phishing and Malware Protection
  The app includes features to protect users from phishing and malware sites, contributing to overall device security.
• Reduces Page Load Time
  By blocking unnecessary ads and trackers, AdGuard can help to reduce page load times, contributing to a smoother browsing experience.

Possible disadvantages

• Not Available on Google Play
  AdGuard is not available on the Google Play Store, which means users need to sideload the app, a process some may find inconvenient or intimidating.
• Requires Configuration
  While AdGuard is highly customizable, it also means that initial set-up and continuous maintenance could be complex for less tech-savvy users.
• Potential Overhead
  Running an ad blocker can consume system resources, potentially affecting the device’s battery life and performance.
• Subscription Cost
  AdGuard for Android operates on a subscription model, which may be a drawback for users looking for a free ad-blocking solution.
• Compatibility Issues
  Some users have reported occasional compatibility issues with other apps, where certain functionality might be disrupted due to aggressive ad and tracker blocking.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

• About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported"

  Safari's ad-blocking abilities are no more potent than what Chrome's Manifest v3 gives you. In fact, the changes in MV3 were inspired by Safari. I used to work adjacent to a team working on anti-ad-blocking tech. Safari's protections are... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• [DISC] Survival Story of a Sword King in a Fantasy World Chapter 172 | Leviatan Scans

  You can also use something like AdGuard (Android/iOS) to block the ads on your phone. It's free. I personally used it and saw no ads on the site. Pretty easy to set up, too. You may need to tweak the filters a bit, though. Source: over 3 years ago

• ad blocks for android phone apps?

  Find Private DNS in Settings, enable it and enter custom provider, either dns.adguard-dns.com or p2.freedns.controld.com should do the trick. If you need more control and filtering, https://adguard.com/en/adguard-android/overview.html. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.