acme.sh VS Commit Together by Github

• Ease of Use
  acme.sh is simple to install and use because it is written in shell script. It does not require any external dependencies, which makes it lightweight and easy to set up.
• Wide Platform Support
  The script is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows (via WSL), which makes it versatile for different environments.
• Supports Various DNS Providers
  acme.sh supports many DNS APIs out of the box, allowing users to automate DNS challenges with their preferred provider easily.
• Automatic Renewal
  acme.sh can automatically renew certificates and deploy them, ensuring uninterrupted HTTPS service without manual intervention.
• Customizable and Extendable
  Because it is a simple script, users can easily customize and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs.
• No Root Necessary
  acme.sh does not require root access for installation and operation, improving security since it can be run without elevated privileges.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited GUI
  Since acme.sh is a command-line tool, those accustomed to graphical interfaces might find it less intuitive to manage, compared to web-based interfaces.
• Learning Curve
  Though it is easy to use for those familiar with the command line, users new to the terminal may face a learning curve when first using acme.sh.
• Community Support
  While there is a community that supports acme.sh, the support might not be as extensive or swift as commercial solutions, potentially leading to delays in troubleshooting.
• Misconfiguration Risks
  Because the installation and configuration are done manually, there is a risk of errors or misconfiguration, especially for users unfamiliar with SSL/TLS certificates.

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Free SSL Let's Encrypt - Acme.sh - Wordpress - Openlitespeed

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Let's Encrypt has been down most of today

  Acme.sh is maintained by ZeroSSL. https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh#2%EF%B8%8F%E2%83%A32%EF%B8%8F%E2%83%A3-about-this-repository. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• SSL certificate requirements are becoming obnoxious

  Lots of ACME software supports configuring CA fallbacks, so even if a CA is down hard for an extended period you can issue certificates with the others. Using LetsEncrypt and ZeroSSL together is a popular approach. If you need a stronger... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• I no longer have an old-school cert on my HTTPS site

  I was amazed by them having so much distrust of the various clients. Certbot is typically in the repositories for things like Debian/Ubuntu. My favourite client is probably - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago