0xProcessing Reviews

1. Barrie Grubb

   · Branch Manager at J & W Carpets · about 2 months ago
   Easy to fit into our existing process

   We were looking for a way to accept crypto payments with no changes to the rest of our workflow. After reviewing payment gateways, 0xProcessing was deemed more feasible than others. The setup was simple and once it ran, never required day-to-day attention. The ability to create payment requests is hassle-free and clear for daily transaction uses; hence, there is no confusion.

   🏁 Competitors: CoinGate, RIZON

   👍 Pros:    Quick to get started|Supports multiple cryptocurrencies|Simple payment request|Clear transaction status

   👎 Cons:    More detailed reporting would be useful|Dashboard customization is limited
2. Cimin Cohen

   · Founder and CEO at Idea Peddler · about 2 months ago
   The goal is to move BitPay in order to utilize it globally.

   Following numerous payment drops and unexpected compliance holds with BitPay, we switched our primary checkout flow to 0xProcessing. Our global clients rely on cross-border technology, services, and products. We needed a payment gateway that is used to handling payment processing and won’t raise flags about something this usual. Actually the onboarding as merchant was quite easy. The API integration into Vettrack’s custom billing stack has taken the dev team the best part of about two afternoons and the docs don’t leave much to the imagination.

   To run its day-to-day operations, Stable is used. We rely heavily on this payment links feature, which is completely automated. The VRCS feature converts incoming volatile assets to stablecoins automatically. The latter aspect alone has given adequate protection to our margins during the dips which get tied up in the afternoon. The 18 supported networks includes nearly everything our clients use. The processing time in so minimal, and we have still yet to have our first chargeback or false fraud flag since we started using it. The interface is effective but has glitches.

   🏁 Competitors: BitPay, CoinGate, RIZON, Coinbase

   👍 Pros:    Vrcs effectively mitigates market volatility risk|Supports a wide range of native tokens and|Transparent fee structure with no hidden billing surprises

   👎 Cons:    Ui dashboard feels overly basic for complex financial analysis|No native fiat payout options available
3. Ahsanul Hasan Amit

   · CEO and Founder at Dream Workers Tech · about 2 months ago
   A practical option for making crypto payments on occasion.

   Since we don't usually process such payments, we weren’t looking for one that was equipped with many sophisticated tools. The first things were reliability and setup that shouldn’t be hard to get used to.

   After looking at a number of options Fireblocks included we found 0xProcessing easier to work with. The on-boarding process was simple and the documentation covered the majority of our needs. It has been doing its job with no additional work since implementation.

   🏁 Competitors: CoinGate, Fireblocks, BitPay

   👍 Pros:    Straightforward on-boarding|Supports several networks|Easy to understand pricing

   👎 Cons:    Limited analytics|Few dashboard customization options

Nodewood Reviews

0xProcessing mentions (0)

Nodewood mentions (16)

• Launchpad to quickly start a SaaS business?

  Hey, thanks for the mention! I'm the creator of Nodewood, and I'm happy to answer any questions anyone has on it, or really anything else in the space I can help with. Source: over 3 years ago

• Build Your Own Web Framework

  This is largely why I built Nodewood [1]. Every time I wanted to start a new project, almost always a SaaS idea, I'd skip over the "boring stuff" like building user management, subscription management, teams, admin, all that, to get to the meat of the business logic, to make sure I had a valid idea. But I still needed all that stuff eventually, so I'd have to lose time later building it all in! So I decided to... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

• Fresh is a new full stack web framework for Deno

  This is actually part of why I created Nodewood [1], because every new Node project required pulling all that together, and every new SaaS idea I had had the same basic requirements (user management, subscription management, teams support, etc). Then I figured, if I found this useful, surely others would too, so I packaged it up and have had a few happy customers since then, who have helped me refine it, which... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

• Ask HN: Side projects that are making money, but you'd not talk about them?

  Well, I've spoken about this before, and on here no less, but only really in response to posts like this. I don't do any advertising or speak about mine except in interviews, since it's usually indicative of the kind of requirements they're looking for. I created a SaaS bootstrap for Javascript called Nodewood [1]. It actually started as just a template for me, because there's a lot of setup for each new JS web... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

• Ask HN: Best SaaS Boilerplate?

  Disclaimer: I'm the author of the following boilerplate. Nodewood (https://nodewood.com/) is a Javascript SaaS boilerplate built to take advantage of using Javascript on the server and in the UI. Models, Validators, and other business logic can be re-used in both builds, so you don't have to write, rewrite, and maintain that logic in both places, or in different languages. It has built-in subscription management... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago