Table of contents
Open Source
XWiki is an open-source platform, which means it is free to use and has a community of developers continuously improving it.
Extensibility
The platform is highly extensible with a wide range of plugins and macros, making it customizable based on user needs.
Collaboration Features
Supports collaborative editing, real-time notifications, and workflow management, enhancing team productivity.
Flexible Permissions
Provides detailed permission management, allowing administrators to control access at various levels (page, space).
Structured Data Management
Allows users to create applications within the wiki to manage structured data efficiently.
Version Control
Includes versioning capabilities, enabling users to track changes and revert to previous versions when necessary.
Multilingual Support
Offers support for multiple languages, making it suitable for global teams.
Integration
Capable of integrating with various third-party applications and services, like LDAP, Active Directory, and more.
Yes, XWiki is a good option for those seeking a sophisticated and adaptable wiki solution that can be customized to meet specific needs. Its open-source nature allows for extensive customization and community-driven improvements.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if XWiki is good.
Check the traffic stats of XWiki on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of XWiki on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of XWiki's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of XWiki on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about XWiki on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
XWiki stands out as a robust solution in the realm of open-source wiki engines, offering significant flexibility and feature-rich capabilities. It is part of a competitive landscape of knowledge management and content collaboration tools, including but not limited to DokuWiki, MediaWiki, Confluence, and TiddlyWiki. Despite its complexity, its functionalities and extent of customization garner attention across various technical discussions.
XWiki is prominently recognized for its enterprise-grade solutions, appealing to both small organizations and large firms. It's often mentioned for its multifaceted offerings such as file management, blogs, comments, and notes, making it an attractive option for enterprises seeking to enhance productivity and facilitate collaboration. It's noteworthy for being Java-based and operating under the LGPL license, which ensures users have the flexibility of open-source software along with the robust capabilities of an enterprise-level platform.
One of XWiki's distinguishing features is its extensibility, with more than 600 plugins and templates available, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs. This level of customization is emphasized across multiple reviews, establishing XWiki as both a content-oriented application platform and a second-generation wiki engine. Such flexibility supports the creation and management of not just content collaboration wikis but also blogs, forums, and task management systems. Moreover, it can host small applications within wiki pages, thereby enriching its scope as a tool for developing bespoke collaborative applications.
Despite these strengths, opinions often highlight the complexity associated with deploying and managing XWiki, particularly for users lacking Java proficiency. The need to set up a servlet container like Tomcat, Jetty, or JBoss presents a potential entry barrier for some users. However, XWiki addresses these challenges by providing detailed installation guides, which have been acknowledged as helpful by the community. This documentation is crucial in mitigating user difficulties and enhancing the approachability of the platform for a broader audience.
In comparison to its competitors, XWiki’s comprehensive feature set and robust extensibility options set it apart, especially for organizations that prioritize customization and enterprise functionality. While its technical demands might steer less tech-savvy users towards alternatives like BookStack or simpler setups, its potential for developing powerful and flexible wiki-based applications makes it a preferred choice among seasoned professionals and organizations needing extensive features.
In summary, XWiki is a sophisticated and feature-rich platform that excels in enterprise environments, offering a broad range of customization options for content collaboration and application development. Its capabilities, though demanding in terms of technical setup, make it a prominent tool in the competitive landscape of wiki engines.
Do you know an article comparing XWiki to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is XWiki good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss XWiki here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
