> It is not actually that hard to run Wordpress securely. Stick to supported plugins and themes, and install security patches quickly when they are released. Depending on your site's functionality, it may also be possible to run a static WP site: * https://wordpress.org/plugins/simply-static/ * https://wp2static.com You do all your regular updates via the CMS, but, instead of putting the dynamic site on the... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
The closest "free" option I can think of is Oracle Cloud, but /r/oraclecloud shows plenty of horror stories in registration and maintaining an instance. If you don't actually need interactive features, WP2Static on your local instance to be deployed to Cloudflare Pages might work. Source: over 1 year ago
> Most WP sites should be static sites. https://wordpress.org/plugins/simply-static/ https://wp2static.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Depending on the site, ask yourself "How dynamic does it actually have to be?". Perhaps using the GUI to update the content, and then creating static files and serving those may be an option: * https://wp2static.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
What is wrong with using Wordpress? I believe now one can get Wordpress to have 'static site' capabilities these days [0] [0] https://wp2static.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
> Unless you have some sort of CI/CD going on, the chances are that one can only post from their own computer, while using something like Wordpress allows them to post from anywhere — including their mobile devices — which leads to a ton of serendipity. There's a plug-in(s) for WP that allows you to have the GUI for convenience, but then generate a static site: * https://wp2static.com *... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
You can still use seo and other content management plugins within the wp install on your own computer where you export the site from, and update the site remotely, either by uploading a new version of your site. Ther're plugins for this: https://wordpress.org/plugins/simply-static/ or https://wp2static.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
A couple of years back, I used WP2Static - https://wp2static.com - but their business model seems to have evolved a bit and now I have to pay or do a bit of work to package it for my site. Source: over 2 years ago
Consider a static WordPress site via the WP2Static plugin: https://wp2static.com Going static solves most of the performance and security problems with WordPress. There's a prebuilt Docker setup at https://lokl.dev/ and an AWS template at https://staticweb.io/open-source/wordpress/ There are also commercial hosts (with their own plugins) at https://www.strattic.com/ and https://www.hardypress.com/ I've worked a... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
This has been covered in a few other posts on this subreddit, but the barebones approach is to install a static site generator for your Wordpress site, like this one: https://wp2static.com/ Then host/mirror on IPFS as you see fit. Source: almost 3 years ago
It’s not a headless setup but would something like wp2static work? Source: about 3 years ago
What you can do is use something like Flywheel to run it locally. Then if you want to take a straight WP site and dump on Netlify use Leon's wp2static @ https://wp2static.com/ to create a static version on the fly. Source: about 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing WP2Static to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about WP2Static. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.