Open-Source
Wiki.js is open-source software, which means it is free to use, and the source code is available for anyone to review, modify, and contribute to.
Modern Interface
The platform features a sleek, modern interface that is user-friendly and customizable, employing responsive design that works well on various devices.
Markdown Support
Wiki.js natively supports Markdown, which is a simple and efficient way to format text. This makes content creation quick and easy for users familiar with Markdown.
Extensibility
The system supports numerous modules and extensions, allowing for high customization to suit the needs of different projects and teams.
Multi-Language
It supports multiple languages, making it accessible and usable by a global audience without the need for additional translation tools.
Authentication Methods
Wiki.js integrates with various authentication methods, including LDAP, OAuth, and even custom authentication, providing flexible security options.
Real-Time Collaboration
With real-time collaborative editing, multiple users can work on the same document simultaneously, improving efficiency and teamwork.
Content Management
The platform includes robust version control and content management features, ensuring that all changes are tracked and reversible.
Search Functionality
Advanced search functionality ensures users can quickly find the information they are looking for, enhancing the overall user experience.
Promote Wiki.js. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Overall, Wiki.js is a strong option for individuals and organizations looking for a dynamic and fully-featured wiki platform. It is well-suited for users who are comfortable with technical setup and prefer a self-hosted solution.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Wiki.js is good.
Check the traffic stats of Wiki.js on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Wiki.js on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Wiki.js's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Wiki.js on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Wiki.js on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Wiki.js is a modern wiki platform built with Node.js and Vue.js. It uses PostgreSQL for storage, supports multiple editor types (Markdown, WYSIWYG, HTML), and integrates with Git for version-controlled documentation. Current stable version is 2.5. Wiki.js site. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Congrats on launching! Quick question: is this closer to WikiJS (https://js.wiki/), TinaCMS (https://tina.io/), Docusaurus (https://docusaurus.io/), or something else? - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Wiki.js is a self hosted, open source Wiki that has a lot of awesome functionality. Unfortunately it's lacking some small, but important UI features, like a light box, to enlarge downsized images to it's full size. And unless you want to add a link to each image, to open it in a new tab, you would probably go for a modal view here. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Https://js.wiki/ is what weโve decided to go with at my company. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Can't think of anything that meets all the criteria, there's always some compromise, which might just be the way it is. For example I could 'self-host' otterwiki or wiki.js on a VPS for a pretty small monthly fee, which I could also use for other stuff that doesn't make sense for a home lab, but then I also need to deal with security since it's hosted on the internet. Or I could self-host and just accept that... Source: over 2 years ago
I love PlantUML. I was always fond of it in my early days as a software engineer and still use it today, along with all the various ways to draw diagrams out there, whether it's through a web tool like draw.io or Miro or through markup like PlantUML and Mermaid. Some stuff I'd like to share with the rest: - PlantUML's default style has improved since the days of red/brown borders, pale yellow boxes, drop shadows... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I've asked on LinkedIn which PostgreSQL application you use so that I can check that it works on Yugabyte. Please, continue to answer. To start let's try with Wiki.js, open source wiki software storing into a PostgreSQL database. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Https://js.wiki/ or any wiki really. Source: about 3 years ago
I use wikijs and is perfect for home wiki with modern look and good features https://js.wiki/. Source: about 3 years ago
Our group uses Wiki.JS. You can upload assets and then link them from wiki pages. Source: about 3 years ago
I think it could be a little bit difficult, but you can try using other tools like wiki js. Source: over 3 years ago
I study CS and a fellow student hosts a Wiki.js server where we summarize lecture information. Wiki js supports mermaid markdown preview out-of-the-box too and for us the big advantage of mermaid diagrams is that the mermaid diagrams are search-indexed, while the content of pictures would obviously not be search-indexed. Source: over 3 years ago
Are you looking for a document management system or wiki? For Wiki I like Wiki.js, for document management, I like Teedy. Source: over 3 years ago
Im also searching for a nice tool! push! I know you wrote "not wiki like" but ill try asap this one out because it looks neat: https://js.wiki/. Source: over 3 years ago
I want to migrate about a dozen low-traffic hobby websites to node.js from .Net (setup years ago when I worked with .Net in my job). So I'm looking for economical node.js hosting with unlimited sites. I plan to use the http module for the static sites, convert the rest, and deploy a few new apps - including a fork of Wiki.js, which needs a database (currently using PostgreSQL). Source: over 3 years ago
If you just want a wiki platform, I recommend Wiki.js. Runs in a container, has a great GraphQL API too which makes it easy to automate new documentation and updates to existing documentation. It isn't Hudu though, it's just a wiki with a lot of great features (like Enterprise SSO) and 0 cost. Source: over 3 years ago
I sync Obsidian with Git and use pandoc for book / ebook generation (or Foam with Visual Code might work too). Scrivener can synchronise with Git too - albeit indirectly (it sync's with a folder & I use a simple script to keep it up to date) If you need to organise research you can sync Wiki.js with Git. However, Gitbook or mdBook might be easier to use for a single book project. https://www.gitbook.com/... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I'm starting with WikiJS, maybe it's worth taking a look. Source: over 3 years ago
Information: these mostly went into a wiki, a notes system, or as a comment on a kanboard task. I use https://js.wiki/ for my wiki and currently still deciding on a notes app so these are just markdown stored in a git repo (https://gitea.io). Source: over 3 years ago
A few ideas * Moodle is an LMS, making it easy to track progress and make announcements. You could create a "course" for the entire organization as its newsroom and additional "courses" for each team. * Alternatives to Slack: Mattermost and Zulip * Wiki software for knowledge management: BookStack, MediaWiki, or Wiki.js. Source: over 3 years ago
WikiJs is a really nice wiki-style solution for markdown docs. Source: over 3 years ago
Wiki.js, an open-source and self-hosted wiki platform, has garnered a strong reputation among software developers, IT professionals, and organizations seeking to manage knowledge effectively. Its presence in various technical discussions highlights its popularity and alignment with modern requirements for documentation, content collaboration, and note-taking.
Database Flexibility: A standout feature of Wiki.js is its versatility with database support. It integrates seamlessly with major databases including PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, MS SQL Server, and SQLite. This adaptability is highly regarded in the community for allowing organizations to leverage existing database systems, thus facilitating integration into diverse IT environments.
User-friendly Interface and Customization: Wiki.js offers an intuitive interface and a performance-driven design built on Node.js. Users appreciate the simple installation process and customizable appearance options, including light and dark modes, enhancing the user experience. The admin area is noted for being comprehensive yet accessible, providing robust control over configurations and user management.
Authentication and Security: The platform is equipped with built-in authentication features accommodating password-protected file sharing and integration with external authentication services such as Google, GitHub, and Microsoft. The inclusion of two-factor authentication (2FA) adds an extra security layer, which is particularly valued by enterprise users.
Feature Richness: Wiki.js is celebrated for its extensive feature set and modular architecture, allowing administrators to enable only the necessary features. Its support for diagram tools like draw.io, PlantUML, and MermaidJS underscores its utility in documenting complex processes, particularly in technical fields.
Cost-Effectiveness and Integration Capabilities: As a free, open-source solution, Wiki.js offers zero licensing costs, standing out as a budget-friendly alternative to proprietary solutions like Confluence. Additionally, it boasts a GraphQL API for easy automation and updates, adding to its enterprise appeal.
The developer community consistently highlights Wiki.js as a preferred choice for a self-hosted wiki. It is often favored for its modern look, substantial features, and ease of use compared to more traditional platforms like DokuWiki and MediaWiki. Many users describe it as being ideal for both personal use in hobby projects and professional use within small teams or enterprises.
However, some users indicate minor shortcomings, such as the lack of certain UI features like a native lightbox for images. Nonetheless, these are generally offset by the platformโs strengths in other areas. Wiki.js is frequently mentioned in community forums as a competitive option when seeking documentation systems, praised particularly for the quality of its user interface and comprehensive support for integrating with third-party tools.
In summary, Wiki.js is lauded for its robust feature set, flexible database support, and user-friendly design, making it a top contender in the self-hosted wiki market. Its combination of enterprise-grade features and adaptability for personal projects positions it favorably against traditional and modern wiki platforms alike. Whether for businesses, educational institutions, or individual use, Wiki.js proves to be a powerful tool for knowledge management and content collaboration.
Do you know an article comparing Wiki.js to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Wiki.js good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Wiki.js here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.