Table of contents
wallabag
Save the web, freely.
As wallabag is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Open Source
Wallabag is an open-source application, meaning its source code is freely available for anyone to inspect, modify, and enhance.
Self-Hosting
Users can self-host Wallabag, providing full control over data privacy and security.
Cross-Platform
Wallabag has applications for multiple platforms, including web, Android, and iOS, ensuring wide accessibility.
Offline Access
Content saved in Wallabag can be accessed offline, which is useful for reading articles without an internet connection.
Customizable
Being open-source, Wallabag can be customized to fit specific needs or integrate with other tools and services.
Import/Export Feature
Wallabag allows users to import and export their saved content in various formats, making data migration easier.
Support for Multiple Formats
Wallabag can save content from a wide range of sources and formats, providing a versatile reading experience.
Wallabag is a solid choice for those seeking a self-hosted, privacy-focused read-it-later service. It offers a robust set of features and flexibility that can cater to the needs of avid readers and tech enthusiasts who prefer open-source solutions.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if wallabag is good.
Check the traffic stats of wallabag on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of wallabag on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of wallabag's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of wallabag on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about wallabag on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
I moved to a self-hosted Wallabag (https://wallabag.org/) after Pocket shut down. Not the sexiest but does everything I need it to. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I'm looking into setting up Wallabag for myself, maybe it could work for you too? https://wallabag.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
I use KOReader [1] on my Kobo. It supports Wallabag [2]. Wallabag offers both hosted [3] and self-hosted options. There's also a standalone kobo client for Wallabag [4]. In addition, Wallabag also supports direct import from Pocket. [1] https://koreader.rocks/ [2] https://wallabag.org/ [3] https://www.wallabag.it/en [4] https://gitlab.com/anarcat/wallabako. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Instapaper[1] and Wallabag[2] would be the two main alternatives to Pocket, I think. Wallabag is self-hosting although I believe there are hosted services around as well. Cannot get either of them to integrate with my Kobo ereader like Pocket does, though. :-( [1] https://www.instapaper.com/ [2] https://wallabag.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
I tried hoarder and I didn't like the way listed view works. I prefer the simplicity of the view provided by Linkding. I find hoarder new auto tagging with ollama something I want to use because I am lazy. For references there are many options in selfhosted bookmarking apps market. These beside Hoarder are the most known software. Linkwarden (https://github.com/linkwarden/linkwarden) LinkAce... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
There is also a self hosted solution called Wallabag https://wallabag.org/ Same concept its about archiving rather than just the link, given how quickly links often die its often what you want depending on why you bookmarked it. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Wallabag[0] is useful too if you want a self-hosted bookmarking solution. I'm with Pinboard too, but regularly export my bookmarks so I have a backed up local copy of recent bookmarks I've added to Pinboard. [0] https://github.com/wallabag/wallabag. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Self hosted Wallabag is the way https://wallabag.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
For plain bookmarking, Linkding and for the rest Wallabag.. Wallabag is like pocket. Source: over 3 years ago
Shiori or Wallabag: Both will save the full-text article. Source: over 3 years ago
One really cool feature that KOReader has for self-hosters though is support for wallabag, which is a "read it later" service that you can self-host. Then you can access your saved articles through its web UI, Android app or KOReader. I highly recommend checking it out if you like reading articles. I installed it this week and am really enjoying it, alongside Miniflux - a self-hosted RSS feed server that can save... Source: almost 4 years ago
Sounds like you should look into setting up a Wallabag instance. Itโs basically an open source alternative to Pocket. Source: over 4 years ago
It also has apps: https://wallabag.org/en. Source: over 4 years ago
You might host an own instance of wallabag! https://wallabag.org/en. Source: over 4 years ago
Store and read articles later anywhere - Wallabag (https://wallabag.org/en). Source: almost 5 years ago
There's this thing called Wallabag. I used it as an inbox for some time, though didn't weave it in my weekly routine. Source: about 5 years ago
Right! So I have all my bookmarks either on Bromite (cold, not synced) or on Wallabag (synced to FF on my pc). Source: about 5 years ago
For my part, I prefer to use my own self hosted instance of Wallabag for this use case. Source: over 5 years ago
Wallabag, a prominent player in the bookmark management, note-taking, and productivity software categories, has garnered a varied but generally favorable opinion among users who discuss alternatives to popular tools like Pocket and Instapaper. As an open-source platform, Wallabag presents itself as a compelling option, particularly for tech-savvy individuals who value customization and control over their digital reading and bookmarking experiences.
Key Advantages:
Open-Source and Self-Hosted Flexibility: A significant appeal of Wallabag is its open-source nature, which provides users with the option to self-host their instances. This feature is consistently praised in discussions as it grants autonomy, enhanced privacy, and adaptability to specific user needs. Many users appreciate the potential for hosting their own servers, seeing it as a viable alternative with robust features akin to Pocket.
Integration with External Tools: Wallabag's compatibility with other tools and devices is noted as a substantial advantage. For example, its integration with KOReader on e-readers like Kobo is highlighted as a valuable feature for individuals who enjoy offline reading. Moreover, Wallabag supports direct import from earlier bookmarked content on Pocket, making transitions seamless for former Pocket users.
Reading Experience: The ability of Wallabag to extract and present article content in a reader-friendly format is frequently mentioned as a strength. By focusing on a simple and clean interface, it enhances the reading experience, allowing users to focus on content without unnecessary distractions.
Customization and Tagging: Users laud Wallabagโs organization features, particularly its tagging system, which enables efficient categorization and retrieval of saved articles. This feature supports users in managing content without the concern of misplacement.
Areas for Improvement:
Interface Design: While Wallabagโs simplicity is appreciated, some opinions point out its lackluster interface design. Compared to competitors that might offer more visually appealing or intuitive UI, Wallabag focuses heavily on functionality over aesthetics, which can be seen as both a drawback and a merit, depending on user preference.
Mobile App Functionality: Although Wallabag offers Android apps and a web UI, some users seek improvements in mobile integrations, as seen in mentions about the limitations when connecting with certain e-readers or mobile platforms, reflecting an area where Wallabag could expand its capabilities.
Feature Set: Despite covering essential features for bookmark management, some discussions suggest Wallabag might lack the abundance of features presented by some of its commercial competitors. For users seeking advanced features, such as built-in recommendation engines or social sharing, Wallabag might fall short.
Overall, the consensus around Wallabag emphasizes its strong suit in privacy, control, and utility for those who prefer self-hosted services. It strikes a balance by offering necessary functionalities for bookmarking and reading while ensuring an approach centered on user freedom and management.
Do you know an article comparing wallabag to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is wallabag good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss wallabag here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
