This page is designed to help you find out whether TigerVNC is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
High Performance
TigerVNC provides a fast and responsive remote desktop experience, making it ideal for tasks that require high interactivity.
Cross-Platform Support
TigerVNC is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing users to leverage the same tool across different environments.
Open Source
Being open-source software, TigerVNC allows for transparency, community contributions, and cost savings as there are no licensing fees.
Encryption Support
TigerVNC supports TLS encryption, enhancing the security of the remote sessions and protecting data from unauthorized access.
Active Development
The project is actively maintained and updated, ensuring compatibility with the latest systems and improvements in functionality.
Yes, TigerVNC is considered a good option for remote desktop applications, especially for users seeking a reliable and secure VNC implementation. Its consistent updates and active community support further enhance its reputation as a solid tool in the remote desktop market.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if TigerVNC is good.
Check the traffic stats of TigerVNC on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of TigerVNC on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of TigerVNC's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of TigerVNC on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about TigerVNC on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Why not TigerVNC? https://tigervnc.org/ > TigerVNC was originally based on the (never-released) VNC 4 branch of TightVNC. It seems to be popular, that’s why I’m asking. - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
Step 2 - Set up VNC If you've set up SSH correctly, this is as easy as installing a VNC viewer client like TigerVNC on another device of choice, then connecting with your SSH credentials. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
To use VNC, you need to install a VNC server on your EC2 instance. There are multiple VNC servers, one good option is TigerVNC. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Next, install the TigerVNC server and other add-ons for its operation:. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
This has been around for a while and so far RealVNC does not have a fix. It's possible that something like TigerVNC [their site] may cope but I've not tried it. Source: over 3 years ago
PS. OpenBSD comes with vmctl, it is a tool like Docker or Qubes VMs. You can jail Firefox inside a VM then connect to their GUI desktop via tigervnc. But I believe, it is too paranoid. Separate user and separate disk partition for Firefox is more than sufficient, given OpenBSD paranoid approach to the application address spaces. Source: over 3 years ago
Create a file called config and add one option each line if you need to give the VNC server more choices. Here's an illustration: Edit ~/.vnc/config. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
TigerVNC[0] might be of interest in this domain. 0 - https://tigervnc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
There are multiple implementations, I like TigerVNC which is maintained by Red Hat. Source: about 4 years ago
I assume you're using the built in apple screen sharing feature? You could try using a 3rd party vnc between machines (e.g. realvnc, tigervnc, or the Java version of tightvnc ). They might interact differently to the built in version. Source: over 4 years ago
Yes, it is. https://tigervnc.org/ is one of the incarnation provided by many Linux distributions. Source: over 4 years ago
Https://tigervnc.org Does some impressive compression tricks that results in it being remarkably snappy. You may prefer to run Xvnc directly rather than use the wrapper script, depends how you want to set everything up. I will be honest here that my setup is not properly automated yet because it's inside a jail on a FreeBSD install and the underlying box gets good enough uptime that my current half-assed approach... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Option (1) is x0vncserver from TigerVNC. They way it works is to connect to the existing session for the local display rather than creating creating a virtual display like a typical VNC session. This allows remote access to the GPU support in the display session. This is the easiest method to setup and generally just works as you're just using the local display session as if you were sitting in front of the... Source: over 4 years ago
I don't know anything about TightVNC, but I do know this is possible with TigerVNC. Just run the server with -SecurityTypes None. Source: over 4 years ago
Take a look at https://tigervnc.org - an open source implementation of VNC, similar to Mac screen sharing, that uses TCP network packets to send compressed descriptions of changes to the computer's frame buffer. Source: over 5 years ago
TigerVNC is a widely recognized tool within the domain of remote desktop access and control, especially among Linux users. As an open-source implementation of the Virtual Network Computing (VNC) protocol, it facilitates remote desktop sharing across varied platforms, heralding capabilities critical in IT support, remote assistance, and cross-platform computing environments. Public opinion on TigerVNC, derived from recent discussions and product mentions, underscores its robust functionality, albeit with some limitations that affect its broader adoption.
Open-Source and Community-Driven: TigerVNC is valued in the tech community for being open-source, maintained by contributors, including Red Hat. This aligns with the ethos of transparency, security, and customization that developers favor, particularly those working within Linux environments.
Security: The software uses Transport Layer Security (TLS) to encrypt connections, addressing a core concern for users wary of eavesdropping and data interception during remote sessions. TigerVNC’s implementation of TLS is frequently cited as a robust feature, comparing favorably against proprietary counterparts.
Performance Enhancements: TigerVNC is praised for its efficient data compression techniques, contributing to its reputation for providing a snappy experience. This aspect particularly appeals to users involved in remote graphics development or those requiring fast response times for remote executions.
Integration and Versatility: It integrates well within Linux distributions and server configurations, drawing interest in domains such as virtualization and container management. Its ability to connect to local display sessions allows for operational flexibility, praised in discussions on remote graphics development.
Manual Configuration: A significant drawback noted by users is the necessity for manual input of the IP address to establish connections, as TigerVNC lacks an automated discovery of VNC servers. This requirement can be cumbersome for those accustomed to more intuitive configurations offered by competitors like TeamViewer or AnyDesk.
Lack of Advanced Features: Users note the absence of features such as file transfer, which are standard in other remote desktop solutions. This omission can limit its use cases for users needing comprehensive remote management capabilities.
Interface and Usability: The interface has been described as less intuitive compared to other alternatives. Its tabbed interface for settings configuration may not be as user-friendly as some competitors, which provide all options in a single window interface.
In comparison with its competitors like TeamViewer, LogMeIn, and RealVNC, TigerVNC positions itself as a tool optimized for technical users who prioritize security and performance over convenience and additional features. While it may not offer the same level of out-of-the-box ease of use or feature set, particularly on non-Linux platforms, it remains a go-to choice for those requiring a secure and reliable remote desktop utility.
In conclusion, TigerVNC stands out in its niche market segment, particularly appealing to a technically proficient audience that values open-source principles and secure performance. However, the absence of user-centric features like automated server detection and file transfer limits its competitive edge in a market where simplicity and multifaceted functionalities are often decisive factors for choosing a remote desktop solution.
Do you know an article comparing TigerVNC to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is TigerVNC good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss TigerVNC here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.