Open Source
Tasks.org is an open-source project, allowing users to contribute to its development and ensuring transparency in its functionality.
Customizable
The app offers a high degree of customization, enabling users to tailor their task management experience to their specific needs.
No Ads
Tasks.org does not display advertisements, offering an uninterrupted and clean user experience.
Privacy-Focused
Tasks.org prioritizes user privacy and does not collect unnecessary personal data, aligning with a growing concern for digital privacy.
Compatibility
The app supports synchronization with popular services like Google Tasks, CalDAV, and EteSync, ensuring flexibility and cross-platform compatibility.
Yes, Tasks.org is a good task management tool, especially for those who value privacy and open-source solutions. Its comprehensive features and integration capabilities make it a strong contender in the productivity app market.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Tasks.org is good.
Check the traffic stats of Tasks.org on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Tasks.org on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Tasks.org's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Tasks.org on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Tasks.org on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
I'm curious, did you mean https://tasks.org/ or something else? Source: over 2 years ago
Edit: and neither do some other features such as 'Filters'. I was aware that some of the features would not sync since that was mentioned in the tasks.org website. But I did not expect this to happen since the website specifically says that tags are synced with DecSync CC. Source: about 3 years ago
I've been trying out a TON of GTD-related apps over the years and recently settled on tasks.org to complement Google Tasks. Honestly, this is an amazing app, but it lacks features that I really want: A Web interface and integration with other applications. Then a week ago, I moved to Todoist, and while it worked great and provided much of what I wanted, its free account limitations were apparent. Bummer, as I... Source: about 3 years ago
Tasks.org: Open-source To-Do Lists & Reminders (version 13.3.2): Fork of Astrid Tasks & To-Do List. Source: about 3 years ago
Then follow me in supporting the project. As I've got little time on my hands atm I'm supporting it financially. And using the tasks.org sync is working well for me (except for the hiccups I denoted in my last two posts and although there's no good desktop solution for my taste as of now). Source: about 3 years ago
There is no tasks.org web app. And Google really doesn't present a decent web app either for Google Tasks other than as a sidebar in Gmail. THere are extensions and other apps that work fairly well, but nothing native. Source: about 3 years ago
Tasks.org It's on android and in the cloud, syncs with Google. I've used it for a few years now and I'm very happy with it. Source: about 3 years ago
Hi, I'm a mod and long-time 90dger working on a mix of personal routines and project-specific goals. I use GTD via Tasks.org to manage my tasks, Loop to track my routines, and Google Keep to capture anything else. Last round started out pretty good but the second half was a complete fail after I got derailed by some work chaos followed by schedule changes, and never got back on track. So this round I'm going to do... Source: over 3 years ago
What about etesync and https://tasks.org/? Source: over 3 years ago
I switched from tasks.org to ticktick since web app is a must have for me (and wearos app whould be nice to have have). I know that it integrates with google tasks, but this way I lose most of the important functionality in the web :(. Source: over 3 years ago
OK, that said, specific to the OP's question, I used to keep "Reference" content in Google Keep, but I have pretty much migrated most of it to using Notion. Why? Because for me, "Reference" content often encompasses information larger than the sentence or two that make up the content in tasks.org. Source: over 3 years ago
So when you are managing your reoccurring tasks with the tasks.org app, do the reoccurring tasks always show under "My Tasks" even though they aren't scheduled for that day? I cannot for the life of me figure out how to mark one as "Done", when I tap it, it just says "Rescheduled for tomorrow" and it stays on my list. Source: over 3 years ago
Tasks.org on f-droid is fine. Nextcloud is webDAV which is a widely used standard with lots of good apps. DAV sync, thunderbird, gnome calendar, etc. nextcloud-desktop on linux and nextcloud on android work well too - or you can access it like a remote filesystem. The nextcloud app also does photo upload. The News reader is quite usable. I used phone-track for some time and it did it's job fine. Source: over 3 years ago
Hi, I'm a mod and long-time 90dger checking in late. I do a mix of personal routines and project-specific goals. I use GTD via Tasks.org to manage my tasks, Loop to track my routines, and Google Keep to capture anything else. I've been pretty hot or cold over the past few rounds, but also slowly refining my routines. Last round I realized I needed to go more fundamental to focus and improve in 3 basic areas: time... Source: over 3 years ago
Hello, I tried migration from ticktick to tasks.org but the importing doesn't work. How do proceed? Any help appreciated. Thanks. Source: over 3 years ago
There is https://tasks.org/ though I think it only has an android application, but syncs for use with other applications on those systems. Source: over 3 years ago
I use it with Fastmail for my main email + calendar + todos, and I use it with Purelymail[1] for simply emails with no nonsense. Both accounts, once setup, just behave. On the groupware front, I use DavX5 and ICSx5 to do to calendar and todo sync to fastmail, and Tasks.org [2] to do the front end for the todos. For my work accounts, I use the nine email app which lets me authenticate to exchange active sync... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Tasks.org: Open-source To-Do Lists & Reminders (version 13.0.1): Fork of Astrid Tasks & To-Do List. Source: over 3 years ago
I'm testing the solution in the title. My goal is having a simple to-do list app that saves data on a selfhosted service and allows the sharing of the lists. Using Radicale as a backend and Tasks.org as mobile app, everything works easily. I evaluate several solutions and this is the better one: Radicale is mature and updated, tasks.org connect to it without the need of DavX5 or other things. Very very good. Source: almost 4 years ago
Https://tasks.org/ has today and atleast 3 levels with lists, tasks, subtasks. The fourth one you could do yourself via title prefix or tags. Source: almost 4 years ago
Oof, that's a little disappointing. Maybe I'll just do everything through my phone then with tasks.org hah. Source: almost 4 years ago
Assessment of Public Opinion on Tasks.org
Tasks.org is a noteworthy player in the domain of task management, touted for its open-source nature and versatility in integrating with various productivity programs. Public opinion about Tasks.org reveals a spectrum of perceptions, highlighting its strengths and areas where it does not meet user expectations.
Open-Source Flexibility: A prominent mention in the community is Tasks.org's foundation as an open-source platform. This characteristic allows for extensive customization, such as multilingual support and the ability to tailor the applicationโs look and feel to individual preferences. Additionally, its capability to synchronize with Google Tasks is appreciated by users seeking cross-platform integration without compromising control over personal data.
Privacy-Centric Approach: One of the distinguishing features of Tasks.org is its emphasis on privacy. Unlike many competing task management applications, it offers end-to-end encryption, which users commend for protecting their personal information without any advertising intrusions.
Integration with Open Protocols: Tasks.orgโs compatibility with open protocols is frequently highlighted in discussions, enabling users to manage tasks effectively across platforms. This aspect is particularly valued by those who rely on self-hosting and using VPNs to ensure privacy and security.
Lack of a Web Interface: Perhaps the most significant limitation noted by users is the absence of a web interface. This shortcoming is highlighted by multiple voices in the community, some of whom have switched to competitors like Todoist or TickTick, despite acknowledging Tasks.orgโs robust functionality on Android. The lack of a web-based counterpart is perceived as a critical gap, particularly for those who prioritize cross-device accessibility in their productivity tools.
Desktop Functionality and Ecosystem Integration: Users have expressed a desire for a more complete integration into desktop environments. While Task.org effectively integrates with Nextcloud and supports protocols like WebDAV, it does not yet offer a dedicated desktop application, which is an essential feature for some professionals. This limitation is compounded by the absence of integration capabilities with broader digital ecosystems, which some users resolve by financially supporting the development of the app in hopes of future enhancements.
Feature Consistency and Syncing Issues: Some users have reported inconsistencies with feature synchronization, particularly tags not syncing with DecSync CC, despite expectations set by the appโs documentation. Additionally, issues with managing recurring tasks on Android devices have been observed, which presents challenges in task management for users reliant on the consistency of such features.
Tasks.org has carved out a respectable niche in the task management space through its open-source and privacy-focused approach. It stands out for its adaptability and secure data practices, making it a suitable choice for tech-savvy users who prioritize customization and data privacy. However, the absence of a web interface and limited desktop support are significant barriers that constrain its usability for a broader audience. As the user community continues to advocate for enhanced features and greater cross-platform functionality, the evolution of Tasks.org will be pivotal in determining its ability to compete with robust alternatives in the productivity ecosystem.
Do you know an article comparing Tasks.org to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Tasks.org good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Tasks.org here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
