Readability
reStructuredText offers a clean, readable syntax that resembles plain text, making it easy for humans to read and write without requiring special software.
Extensibility
It permits extensions and custom directives, allowing users to create new functionalities and adaptations specific to their needs.
Integration
It is the default markup language for Python documentation and is naturally supported by Sphinx, which makes it suitable for generating detailed and attractive documentation.
Semantic Richness
reStructuredText supports comprehensive semantic markup structures, enabling detailed annotations and proper structuring of documents.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if reStructuredText is good.
Check the traffic stats of reStructuredText on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of reStructuredText on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of reStructuredText's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of reStructuredText on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about reStructuredText on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Much (but not all) of what you are looking for exists in the reStructuredText [1] space. Sphinx [2] is an SSG focused on technical writing about software that you may find worth exploring. Also, the scientific text community has been pushing MyST [3] which is an attempt to take some of the best ideas of reStructuredText and reapply them to Markdown-style syntax as a baseline. The MyST tools are a lot more recent... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I can sympathize with the OP authors' frustration with Markdown and resulting preference for ASCIIDoc (try to format a poem, or a play script, in Markdown). Lots of people have addressed this, and NIH rules supreme -- see reStructured Text[2]. However several comments here mention the convenience of a workflow based on Markdown + GIT. Exactly that workflow is the heart of Leanpub[0]. That site facilitates writing... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Markup language: Markup language is used to write documents in a way that distinguishes them from plain text. Most SSGs utilize lightweight markup languages, such as Markdown. However, alternatives like AsciiDoc, Textile, and ReStructuredText are also used. These lightweight languages simplify content creation and are converted into HTML during the site generation process. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Uses Sphinx, reStructuredText And the sphinx-rtd-theme for writing, building And rendering the documentation. Source: about 2 years ago
If we're dreaming, ReStructed Text support. Source: over 2 years ago
You can always switch to rstยน and sphinxยฒ to produce html/pdf came join the dark side, we have tablesยณ :) 1. https://docutils.sourceforge.io/rst.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
ReStrutucturedText is still useful to look at for inspiration here. It had the concepts of extensible metadata ("field lists"), spans ("interpreted text"), and blocks ("directives"). Including things like applying metadata to spans (using essentially Footnotes to provide field lists to interpreted text sections, like but better than Markdown's reference style for hyperlinks which almost no one uses but were much... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Minimal OpenD6 provides ReStructuredText source For the document, as well as simple PDF, HTML, EPUB, Microsoft Word .docx, and OpenOffice/LibreOffice .odt output. Conversions to Other formats are possible using pandoc or Other means. Source: over 3 years ago
- reStructuredText lets you create in-line documentation.Most Python documentation is written with reStructuredText. Itโs like Markdown, but with all the optional extensions built in. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Our User Guide is written in RST and converted to HTML by Sphinx. Source: over 4 years ago
Thanks, while looking into docstyle I found this and this and these things are largely what I was interested in. As for the over-commenting, I should probably cut that out. Source: over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing reStructuredText to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is reStructuredText good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss reStructuredText here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.