Poly/ML
The Poly/ML implementation of Standard ML – full multiprocessor support in the thread library and garbage collector, interactive debugger, fast compiler.
The Poly/ML implementation of Standard ML – full multiprocessor support in the thread library and garbage collector, interactive debugger, fast compiler.
This page is designed to help you find out whether Poly/ML is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
Performance
Poly/ML is known for its efficient compilation and execution, offering a robust performance that is comparable to other major ML implementations.
Compatibility
Poly/ML conforms to the Standard ML language specification, ensuring compatibility with established codebases and standards.
Interactive Environment
It provides a rich interactive environment which is suitable for development and debugging, making it easier to test snippets of code quickly.
Garbage Collector
Equipped with an efficient garbage collector, Poly/ML manages memory well, contributing to the smooth running of applications.
Multi-platform Support
Poly/ML runs on numerous platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing versatility in deployment.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Poly/ML is good.
Check the traffic stats of Poly/ML on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Poly/ML on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Poly/ML's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Poly/ML on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Poly/ML on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Once I got the parser ready in OCaml, I thought I port it to Standard ML, since it belong to the same ML language family. I was also curious on how well mlton could optimise it. The language lacks custom let bindings, so I resorted to use Result.bind manually. This makes code much less readable and more verbose. The standard library also lacks result type, so I had to come up with my own simple implementation.... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
> I hope something similar comes to common lisp. When you say "something similar", what are you thinking about? Simply this rather professional presentation, or something social, or something technical? Or the fact of a renaissance? Is this sort of revamp a cause or a symptom of a renaissance? For Common Lisp it's always seemed to me that SBCL (disclaimer: never used it, only read about it) is the "modern" option... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Poly/ML to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Poly/ML good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Poly/ML here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
