Comprehensive Data Access
Orbiter provides users with extensive access to a range of medical physics databases and resources, facilitating in-depth research and learning.
User-Friendly Interface
The platform offers a straightforward and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and find the resources they need.
Collaborative Features
Orbiter supports collaboration among users, allowing for shared projects and discussions, which enhances the research experience.
Regular Updates
The platform is regularly updated with the latest resources and data, ensuring that users have access to current and relevant information.
Educational Support
Orbiter includes educational tools and resources that aid in the learning and teaching of medical physics concepts.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Orbiter is good.
Check the traffic stats of Orbiter on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Orbiter on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Orbiter's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Orbiter on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Orbiter on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
You can use realistic simulators like: http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/ (it's free and open-source: https://github.com/orbitersim/orbiter ) so it means that now the main problem is building the hardware, but the software part is mostly solved. Before there were no simulators, and barely usable computers. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Orbiter is more of a hardcore spacesim than a "game" in traditional sense, but also qualify. Source: over 2 years ago
Orbiter does it, but I doubt the solution they use (whatever it is) would work with the game engine Nova uses. Reentry does it too. I guess it depends on how the game has been coded. Probably difficult to implement if it wasn't designed with time compression in mind to start with. Source: over 2 years ago
Kerbal (KSP) is one way, but I would highly encourage you to seek out Orbiter Space Flight Simulator 2016 here http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/ (all free) and its forum here https://www.orbiter-forum.com/. Tens of thousands of hours of work here for your enjoyment, when you look at the base simulator (Dr. Martin Schweiger's work), the rendering engines, the vessels, the mods and the expertise from the community ...... Source: almost 3 years ago
Iโve searched a bit and found this: http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/ Has anyone played orbiter ? Source: about 3 years ago
This looks amazing! I don't play KSP but Orbiter, not sure if you've heard of that? Would it be easy to make this compatible with the keyboard keys Orbiter uses? Source: about 3 years ago
Orbiter Space Flight Simulator here. This is the core simulator software created by Martin Schweiger, a British college professor who took astrophysics classes and had the idea to develop this sim like 20 years ago. Since then community members have contributed to it, including Landsat project, so you will not have better earth textures. Source: about 3 years ago
If you want something hardcore to tide you over until the hard mode mods for KSP2 come out, give Orbiter a try. It's what I used to play before KSP came out and is a kind of freeware KSP with RSS and life support if your ship has it. Source: over 3 years ago
I know the theory and can do the basics like FA-off landings on outposts (my past experience in Orbiter helps, too). It's the aiming in combat I need to work on. Source: over 3 years ago
If you want a realistic simulator: Orbiter Space Flight Simulator 2016. It's free and you don't need a fat gaming pc. http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/. Source: over 3 years ago
Http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/ NASA flight software source code for Apollo and other spacecraft. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
No, itโs independently in development since 2000. havenโt played myself for a few years now but itโs still out there -> Orbiter. Source: over 3 years ago
I've played Orbiter a lot, and I'm very used to its control scheme. With some alterations to it, I've managed to also set it up for ED. The main thing about this control scheme is that you use the numpad to control the ship movement:. Source: over 3 years ago
Orbiter is a thing that exists. With a few mods, it's almost worth playing for people who aren't hardcore space nerds. Source: almost 4 years ago
Orbiter 2016 (an awesome spaceflight simulator if you want something more realistic than KSP). Source: about 4 years ago
I recommend checking out Orbiter. It's pretty bare-bones but it uses exactly the method you're describing. As for adding this to KSP 2, I don't think it's worth the cost of completely rewriting the orbital physics of a game this late in development that's already gone through development hell. Source: about 4 years ago
If you're unwilling to spend $40 on a game that sends little green people screaming to their demise, Orbiter is free but is significantly more difficult. Source: over 4 years ago
Orbiter? Some of the craft in that have got fairly well modelled systems, and I think you can get add-ons that model the Apollo spacecraft quite well. Source: over 4 years ago
... And the grand master work of all space simulators (no exploration elements unfortunately)... "Orbiter" (http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/). Source: over 4 years ago
I'm an Orbiter fan and player from a decade, and I really miss a true gravitation physic in E:D. I'd love to plot orbits around celestial body, and plan realistic re-entries on planets instead of the typical, impossible, sci-fi "dive-in" approach. Source: over 4 years ago
Another option in addition to KSP is Orbiter: http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/. Source: over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Orbiter to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Orbiter good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Orbiter here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.