Table of contents
Ease of Use
Moss.sh offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies server management for developers. It automates various tasks such as deploying applications, managing databases, configuring backups, and security settings, which can save significant time and effort.
Integration
Moss.sh can integrate with popular cloud service providers like AWS, DigitalOcean, and Google Cloud, providing flexibility and a wide range of options for hosting and scaling applications.
Security Features
Moss.sh provides built-in security features, including automatic installation of security updates, firewall management, and SSL certificate management, which enhances the security posture of your servers with minimal manual intervention.
Collaboration
The platform supports team collaboration, allowing multiple users to access and manage servers efficiently, which is particularly useful for development teams working on shared projects.
Backups and Monitoring
Moss.sh offers automated backup solutions and server monitoring capabilities that help in maintaining data integrity and uptime, providing peace of mind through reliability and transparency.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Moss.sh is good.
Check the traffic stats of Moss.sh on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Moss.sh on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Moss.sh's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Moss.sh on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Moss.sh on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Moss.sh - Help developers deploy and manage their web apps and servers. Free up to 25 git deployments per month. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Later, I deleted one of the cron jobs in moss.sh, but it still exists on the server and continues to run. Source: about 3 years ago
Then, I deleted one of the crons I no longer needed using moss.sh. Source: about 3 years ago
Does anybody have experience with moss.sh and knows how I can run docker containers on it? I use it to manage some online servers and came across focalboard but it seems it can only be installed via docker and I am not too deep into the server stuff to know how to do it on moss.sh :(. Source: about 3 years ago
Moss.sh is free up to 25 deploys a month. Source: over 3 years ago
Currently looking at ploi.io basic plan they seem to be promising quite a good offering, (steering clear from cpanel and plesk, thier a nightmare to work with ingeneral), another that has me on the fence is moss.sh and cloudpanel.io. Source: over 3 years ago
This is not accurate. While some shared hosts offer node or rails you will be limited by memory and it might not even run your app. The reason PHP is so good for shared hosting is that it runs per request and when you have rarely visited PHP application it requires basically no resources. You can have 100s of small websites sharing resources that get few visitors a day on single server and it will be fine. Try... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
Moss.sh - Help developers deploy and manage their web apps and servers. Free up to 25 git deployments per month. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Alternatively, you can look into moss.sh - also manages your server for you but doesn't come close to Cloudron in terms of apps and feature goodiness. Source: over 4 years ago
Moss.sh & RunCloud seems to be a pretty good option here. You can always hang out on the free tier on moss and then switch if you have issues with it. You'll most likely have to pay for those features tho and RunCloud seems to have a reasonable price tag for it. Source: over 4 years ago
Moss.sh is increasingly recognized in the hosting and developer tools space as a viable alternative to traditional web management solutions like cPanel and Plesk, especially among users looking for flexibility in managing PHP, Node.js, and WordPress installations on cloud servers. The platform provides a streamlined experience for developers and server administrators, allowing them to set up and manage applications effortlessly, directly on a fresh Ubuntu server.
One standout feature that draws users to Moss.sh is its generous free tier, which permits up to 25 Git deployments per month. This makes it an attractive option for small projects or developers with limited deployment needs who want to test the platform without immediate financial investment. Although the free tier might eventually necessitate an upgrade for extended features, it provides a cost-effective entry point into server management, especially for beginners or small-scale operations.
Moss.sh's integration capability supports a variety of applications, notably PHP and Node.js projects, positioning it as a highly adaptable solution for web developers. Notably, Moss.sh's native support for WordPress underscores its appeal to users running CMS-driven websites. Despite not offering an extensive range of features compared to alternatives like Cloudron, which has been praised for its comprehensiveness, Moss.sh is noted for effectively managing essential server operations for web apps.
The platform is often likened to other well-regarded solutions in the server management market, such as Ploi.io and RunCloud. Although some users express reliance on Moss.sh's ability to automate web deployments and manage servers, others caution those less versed in server management to prepare for potential complexities, as highlighted in queries about running Docker containers, which require a basic understanding of server operations.
There are some concerns regarding certain functionalities on Moss.sh, such as the management of cron jobs, where users have noted instances of cron jobs persisting post-deletion. This suggests a need for Moss.sh to enhance its interface or documentation to address and guide users through correcting such problems effectively.
Overall, Moss.sh is positioned as an appealing choice for developers seeking a simplified, economical approach to server and application management. It competes well with other hosting management tools like RunCloud and Ploi.io, particularly among those looking to avoid the legacy complexities of solutions like cPanel and Plesk. Its free tier serves as a significant differentiator, enticing users to explore its offerings and discover its potential within their development cycles.
Do you know an article comparing Moss.sh to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Moss.sh good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Moss.sh here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
