Table of contents
Open Source
MediaWiki is free and open-source software, allowing users to modify the source code to fit their specific needs without incurring licensing fees.
Scalable
MediaWiki is designed to handle large-scale projects, making it suitable for enterprise-level documentation as well as large communal knowledge bases like Wikipedia.
Version Control
Each edit in MediaWiki is stored, allowing users to track changes, revert to previous versions, and see the edit history, which is crucial for collaborative environments.
Extensive Documentation
MediaWiki comes with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers and users to get started and troubleshoot any issues that arise.
Multilingual Support
MediaWiki supports multiple languages, enabling the creation of content in various languages, useful for global organizations.
Extensible
MediaWiki is highly extensible via plugins and extensions, allowing users to add functionalities tailored to their specific needs.
MediaWiki is a highly effective platform for creating and managing collaborative and information-centric websites. Its stability, scalability, and active community support make it a solid choice for individuals and organizations seeking a comprehensive wiki solution.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if MediaWiki is good.
Check the traffic stats of MediaWiki on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of MediaWiki on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of MediaWiki's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of MediaWiki on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about MediaWiki on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
MediaWiki, a hallmark in the domain of open-source wiki engines, is often regarded as a preeminent choice for individuals and organizations aiming to construct and maintain comprehensive knowledge bases. Introduced in 2002 as a replacement for UseModWiki, MediaWiki has become synonymous with Wikipedia, one of its most well-known implementations. This association has cemented its reputation as a robust, scalable, and versatile platform, and it's frequently highlighted in technical articles discussing top self-hosted wiki solutions.
Public opinion about MediaWiki is largely shaped by its rich heritage and the extensive feature set it offers. Its formative role in supporting Wikipedia’s evolution involved the introduction of several innovative features such as namespaces, watchlists, and user talk pages, all of which have enhanced content creation and collaborative efforts. This background makes MediaWiki an attractive option for organizations seeking dependable and scalable wiki solutions.
MediaWiki's strengths lie in its open-source foundation, allowing users to contribute to its development and customization. It is highly extensible, supporting a multitude of extensions and configuration settings, which ensures that users can tailor the software to meet their specific needs. Its lightweight wiki markup is often cited as a user-friendly alternative to HTML, making content creation accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. Moreover, the software’s ability to handle multiple languages and provide translation services aids organizations in localizing content for diverse audiences.
Despite its strengths, some users point out that MediaWiki requires dedicated server maintenance and installation, which can be a hurdle for smaller teams lacking technical support infrastructure. However, it offers detailed and user-friendly installation guides to mitigate these challenges. Furthermore, its use of PHP and MySQL, technologies familiar to many developers, offers a reliable and consistent framework for both novice and experienced users.
Comparatively, MediaWiki holds its own against competitors such as DokuWiki, TiddlyWiki, Wiki.js, and XWiki. While some alternatives may offer more streamlined interfaces or integrated note-taking capabilities, MediaWiki stands out due to its proven track record and extensive feature set that caters to large-scale projects and enterprises.
In summary, MediaWiki remains a preferred choice for those seeking a flexible, powerful, and community-driven wiki engine. Its legacy and ongoing development are testaments to its utility and adaptability in a rapidly evolving technological landscape. While it might not be suitable for all contexts, especially those without dedicated technical resources, it undoubtedly serves as a reliable backbone for any collaborative knowledge-sharing initiative seeking a time-tested platform.
Do you know an article comparing MediaWiki to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is MediaWiki good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss MediaWiki here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
