Table of contents
Integrated Version Control
Kiln provides both Git and Mercurial version control systems, allowing teams to work with their preferred system and offering flexibility for different project needs.
Code Review System
Kiln includes a built-in code review process, enabling teams to provide feedback on code changes efficiently and ensuring code quality through peer review.
Seamless Integration
It integrates well with other productivity and project management tools such as FogBugz, enhancing workflow by combining version control with issue tracking.
Secure Hosting
Kiln offers secure hosting options, ensuring that code repositories are protected with multiple layers of security and backup systems.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Kiln is good.
Check the traffic stats of Kiln on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Kiln on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Kiln's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Kiln on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Kiln on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Kiln, a robust product offered by Fog Creek Software, stands prominently in the realm of code collaboration and version control systems (VCS). Recognized for its dual support for Git and Mercurial, Kiln is often cited in discussions involving tools like Atlassian Bitbucket Server, GitKraken, Apache Subversion, Azure DevOps, and GitHub Desktop. The platform is especially highlighted in technical circles for its suitability within medium to large organizations, ranging between 100 to 500 employees.
Kiln is primarily known as a paid source code hosting service that appeals to a niche audience within the software development community due to its comprehensive feature set. Notably, potential users are given the opportunity to explore Kiln's capabilities through a 30-day free trial that includes all features. Pricing for Kiln begins at $18 per month, which is billed annually. However, it is important to note that the Code Review Module incurs additional costs, which could be a consideration for teams seeking intricate code review processes alongside version control.
A consistent point in the public discourse about Kiln is its targeted audience. While smaller teams might explore free or low-cost alternatives for version control, Kilnโs pricing and feature set align more closely with the demands of larger organizations. In enterprises with extensive codebases and complex project management needs, Kiln offers the organizational tools required to facilitate efficient workflow and code management, making it a favorable choice for companies operating at a significant scale.
In the broader context of version control systems, Kiln is recognized among a competitive set of solutions like Git and Mercurial SCM. While platforms such as GitHub have widespread appeal due to a broader community and more extensive integrations, Kiln distinguishes itself with its specialized offering for combined Git and Mercurial support โ a feature that not all competitors provide. This dual support can be a decisive factor for organizations that prefer or require the use of both version control systems within their project environments.
The reception of Kiln in the software community is generally positive among its target demographic, who appreciate the solid infrastructure and emphasis on developer workflows. However, smaller teams or those on tight budgets might find the requirement to pay separately for additional modules, like the Code Review, less appealing. This aspect often leads to comparison with other platforms that might bundle such features within a single pricing model.
In conclusion, Kiln maintains a respectable position in the competitive landscape of code collaboration tools, primarily valued for its dual VCS support and its design tailored for large development environments. Its strengths in managing substantial projects and fostering collaboration across large teams mark it as a preferred choice for organizations with sophisticated development and operational needs.
Do you know an article comparing Kiln to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Kiln good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Kiln here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
