Table of contents
Open Source
Gajim is open-source software, allowing users to review, modify, and distribute the code as needed. This ensures transparency, security, and flexibility for the user community.
Cross-Platform
Gajim is available for multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
Feature-Rich
Gajim offers a comprehensive set of features including multi-account support, encrypted messaging (via OMEMO, OpenPGP), and extensive customization options.
Active Development
Gajim has an active development community that continuously works on updates, bug fixes, and new features. This helps keep the software up-to-date with current standards and user needs.
Plugins and Extensions
Users can enhance Gajim's functionality through a variety of available plugins and extensions, which can add new features or improve existing ones.
Gajim is a solid choice for users seeking an open-source instant messaging client with robust XMPP support and security features. However, the experience may vary based on your specific needs and familiarity with configuring open-source software.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Gajim is good.
Check the traffic stats of Gajim on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Gajim on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Gajim's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Gajim on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Gajim on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
If you want something that's more of a Slack/Discord alternative, gajim is receiving a lot of attention and polish lately, with Dino and Beagle as simpler alternatives. Source: about 3 years ago
I used Pidgin back in the day of AIM and ICQ, but nowadays, for XMPP, there’s Dino and Gajim for desktop and Conversations.im for Android. As far as I know, OTR has been superseded or replaced by OMEMO in most clients. Source: about 3 years ago
Https://gajim.org/ is a pretty good one. Source: about 3 years ago
You can get a number from jmp.chat and use an app like Gajim (available on Windows/Mac/Linux). Source: over 3 years ago
On the desktop I use the gajim XMPP client. On my phones I use Conversations and Blabber (the latter is a fork of Conversations), and all messages between clients are encrypted with OMEMO. Source: almost 4 years ago
As for Snikket not having a desktop client, I know that's a limitation for many. However any modern XMPP desktop client should generally work, we usually recommend Gajim or Dino (both have small downsides, but they are under active development and that's good news - e.g. Gajim plans to support calls, and Dino is spreading to new platforms such as Windows). If Kontalk's desktop client is XMPP-compliant, that may... Source: almost 4 years ago
Gajim and Dino both work on Windows and Linux and support most features you'd expect (Gajim is mature, Dino is a newer project and Windows support is still experimental). There is also Movim, a web client. Source: almost 4 years ago
>What about iOS? [Siskin] [1] seems to be the best client for iOS right now. It's not as good as Conversations. >What about desktop? I am pretty happy with beagle (OSX) [2], Dino (Linux) [3] and Gajim (linux, windows, OSX) [4]. If in-browser is your thing, converse.js [5] or movim [6] come to mind. >What if I don't want to run my own XMPP server? Use quicksy.im? [1] https://siskin.im [2] https://beagle.im [3]... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
While it's true there are multiple clients that can work, we do have some recommendations. Notably, we test to make sure things are working with Conversations (for Android) before calling something done, and often test with Gajim and Movim as well. Source: about 4 years ago
YO. I host an XMPP server. Registration is open on 3 hosts: "Toofast.vip", "Hardelectronic.vip" or "Macceo.Co" for Eve Online related stuff. Once registered you can use that JID (jabber ID) for use on any federated MUC (multi user chat). On other servers! That's a beauty of XMPP (https://xmpp.org) is that it's decentralized, and opensource. You can use for desktop (my recommendation) https://gajim.org and... Source: over 4 years ago
If you like Pidgin I'd recommend https://gajim.org/ - it has a similar feel to the UI, is cross-platform and actively developed. Use it with a modern up-to-date server (see https://joinjabber.org/ for some general advice, and https://compliance.conversations.im/ for testing a specific server). - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
In this case, I would rather suggest others to use the likes of Element a Matrix client, or e.g. RetroShare, Briar, OnionShare, or e.g. XMPP with the clients like Dino, Conversations, Gajim, ChatSecure. Source: over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Gajim to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Gajim good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Gajim here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
