Table of contents
Version Control Integration
Fossil is a distributed version control system that integrates bug tracking, a wiki, and a blog, providing a comprehensive development environment in one tool.
Self-Contained
Fossil is a single executable that contains everything needed, making it easy to install and manage with low dependency overhead.
Simple UI
Fossil includes a built-in, easy-to-use web interface that allows users to browse repositories, manage tickets, and handle wiki content without needing separate tools.
SQLite Backend
Fossil uses an SQLite database to store all its data, making it reliable, efficient, and easy to backup and transfer.
Integrated Bug Tracking
The integrated bug tracking system allows developers to manage issues and bugs directly within the same environment, streamlining the workflow.
Cross-Platform
Fossil is designed to work on multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, ensuring a consistent experience across different environments.
Strong Documentation
Fossil comes with extensive documentation and a supportive community, which helps users quickly get up to speed and solve issues.
Fossil is a solid choice for users looking for a simple and reliable SCM system without the overhead of more complex alternatives like Git. It is particularly well-suited for projects where integrated features like bug tracking and wikis are beneficial. However, for very large or complex projects, or where external integration with other tools is crucial, other options might be more suitable.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Fossil is good.
Check the traffic stats of Fossil on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Fossil on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Fossil's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Fossil on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Fossil on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Fossil[0] has bug tracking as a standard feature, and through the HTTP role-based authentication, you are able to set up users with different privileges; for instance, being able to read and write the bug tracker without the ability to push new code. [0]: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Sort of repeating a nested comment, but - I've been using fossil ( https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki ) for years and absolutely love it. Single executable you just download and put in your path. Sane, well-documented interface (CLI, API and web). Full repo in a single SQLite file. Highly intelligent and efficient diff-based storage and compression (including network transfers). Rock-solid code.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Neither do I. This discussion isn't about what someone else runs or doesn't run on their computers. By all means, run `jj`. Or use `fossil`[1], which I maintain is technically superior to both `git` and `jj` (if you disagree, show me another VCS that also gives me a ticketing system, wiki, documentation system, forum and webui, all from a single executeable that allows me to set everything up with a few command... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Feedback to author: The diagram and explanation took a beat longer than normal to scan, since this buries a bit that it's not about the beautiful source control system called fossil shipped as a composition of modules: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki Great diagrams, so of course that's the first thing a reader will skim. People biuld things based on git all the time, the diagram looks like... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
There are (all too rare) tools that back those objects with git as well. And there's always fossil ... https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki But it's not git. :-(. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
I don't think git should be the infrastructure of collaboration. It's good for long-lived artifacts, but isn't good for discussion, for rights management, ... Fossil (https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki) is of course better, but if git must remain, I believe the base infrastructure should be the mailing list. Patches, branches and releases can live inside a mailing list, it is naturally built for... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Have you spent much time using Fossil? https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
> To make things more complicated, they also use their a relatively niche version management system instead of git. Which would complicate making contributions (if they accepted them). The Fossil VCS actually has a page explaining why it was created, instead of just using Git: https://sqlite.org/whynotgit.html Honestly, a lot of those points make sense, especially how Git is perhaps a little bit more complex and... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Or https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki if you don't mind learning some new commands. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
For the most part there's really only the built-in docs as it never really got popular (which I suspect is largely due to the opinionated take on Cathedral vs Bazaar use-cases). Source: over 2 years ago
There was still CVS/RCS. They both suck in comparison svn, which sucks in comparison to git (which itself sucks in comparison to fossil; if only fossil wasn't quite so tightly bound to cathedral model...), but they were around. Source: over 2 years ago
Related: You can use the Fossil bug tracker as a generic SQLite table. You can modify the interface for any type of input. While you can edit the schema if you want to use it as a traditional SQL database, I've found it easiest to treat one of the text columns as JSON and do queries on that. The advantages: You get a web interface for free (using CGI) if you want one, it's distributed and version controls your... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Fossil, the web ui for the version control system. It is a single statically linked binary that is also used as the command-line tool. It is truly simple. No pile of dependencies or external database to maintain or any other complexities. Source: over 2 years ago
Fossil SCM (https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki) It's almost like Git + Gitea, all in a single application. Code + tickets + wiki + notes all version controlled and capable of hosting the server itself. Also, the repo is just a SQLite database, so backup is easy. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Fossil could be one of them. https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
I'm inclined to look at tools like fossil again, for it's distributed issue tracking and wiki capability https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Also, I don't think you can separate having effective backups from having organized files to begin with. Instead of going full github, take a look at Fossil SCM (https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki). Source: over 3 years ago
I have been kicking the tires on Fossil, lately, https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki which incorporates an embedded http server. It lets you create content through your browser, via a wiki interface. Source: over 3 years ago
The Sqlite/Fossil website, although not written in SQL, the entirety of it is a single sqlite/fossil db. Source: over 3 years ago
I don't know, why automated bots classified my question as spam on r/Development, maybe because of a link here, but I am looking for every useful hint, and every full answer in the research for integrated solutions crafted for single developers. Up to now I have found only two, it's Bazaar in Solo mode and Fossil. So does anyone know others? Source: almost 4 years ago
I contend that Americans need to rise up and require a government that makes federal legislative and tax "code" visible through a read-only fossile[1] repository. Maybe a state alcan lead the way. For non-classified discussion, the fact that we are paying customers and aren't privy to the who/what/where/when/why of these important decisions is just last-century. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Fossil to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Fossil good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Fossil here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
